Bravehearts have recently released a 32 page brochure for children on Keeping Safe. 

Apart from the fact that my 13 year old daughter could have done a much better job on putting the article together, i must say that Alecomm certainly does not approve of such statements as "Do you trust your mum and dad", and "You can trust police and KIDS HELP LINE".  

As stated previously, the church and state are having a terribly difficult time in admitting and making right, past abuses.  So why would Bravehearts tell all these innocent children that they can trust the State?  With DoCs being responsible for almost one million children stolen from young mothers up until the 1970's, the stolen generation, and the new generation of stolen children now, why would ANYBODY tell innocent little children that they can trust the state.  This is so far from the truth that Bravehearts Hetty Johnson needs to have her head read.  I guess money does buy love, because Bravehearts are funded by DoCS and "we gotta keep that cash coming in" now don't we Hetty?

What sort of people think that it is NOT abuse to make a young child question whether or not they can trust their parents?  Or their family?  The mother and father are the childs first and (generally) main role model FOR LIFE - to create such doubt in a childs mind IS nothing less than child abuse in the first degree.  This propoganda is being spread throughout each and every school in NSW - and the only testing that has been done is with the RTA, some Indian company and a few other places that have absolutely nothing to do with children.

Attachments:

keepsafe.pdf

[Dittos Keep Safe - and dont trust your parents - Propoganda Program for NSW Schools]

Its been over a year since Pru Goward started receiving her Ministerial pay packet .

But Pru Goward is just another puppet on a string viz Theatrical Prop for Department of Community Services NSW.

This is a woman who stated how badly she wanted this portfolio , and also stated that children would start going home. Yet children have already lost their lives on her watch and now the abusers of the past NGO's are being handed innocent children on a platter that will bring them Billions over the next few years.

Why doesn't Pru Goward sit down for a chat with a few Forgotten Australians, Child Migrants, Stolen Generation and Forced Adoption Victims and hear of the rape, buggery, beatings and trauma that was caused by NGO's.

Community Services NSW are out of control and have come become addicted to using Families and their Innocent Children as commodities/pots of gold. And to make things far worse ... Pru is more than happy to sacrifice the innocent lives of thousands of Children in care to the past abusers (The current NGO's who Pru Goward transferring out of home care to) - who have already destroyed over 500,000 children in this country alone , let alone the millions they've destroyed world wide.

History repeats and is repeating on Pru's watch.  How bloody shameful this country is and to think all that needs to be done is to look back on the dirty stigmas and learn how never to repeat them.  Hence ..........here we go again .....SUFFER THE LITTLE CHILDREN under State and Church.

Social cleansing is alive and well in NSW along with State Enforced Child Trafficking.

Why is it that now we are after an organisation who has specialty in dealing with Government and Administrative Law that the professionals in this field are telling us that "they cannot work for us because they do work for the government, and that would be a conflict of interest".???

Robert McLachlan for example, works for the government continuously in child protection matters and then will work for the private section (not necessarily having positive outcomes though), and Stephen Marks works as a child representative a lot of the time in child protection matters (basically works for DoCS),  and then works for the victim parents who have had their children snatched by DoCS.  Isn't this a conflict of interest too?

It gets better when you find out that DoCS continually use up all solicitors and legal personnel in rural areas, forcing victim parents to then have

The Mental Health Act has had some interesting changes over the past few years.  Imparticular, the right to basically do what anybody wants, including detaining you for up to six months because they (the government) decide to.  Furthermore, the Magistrate involved in your case has the ability to keep adjourning your matter for trial, to see whether you are compentant or not to leave the facility, for up to two weeks at a time ... If the Magistrate decides that this would be in Your Best Interest.

Attachments:

Mental Health Act Project	[ ]
Political Dissent and Sluggish Schizophrenia in the Soviet Union	[ ]

Alecomm has been researching for the past two years about the rights of parents who have children who are in the care of the government  and that are being abused.  So what are the parents rights you wonder?  Most people would lead us to believe that the Childs Rights and Safety would be the most important concern, as is the common statements from all the government personnel involved in care, however it is very much different.

First of all, here are a few things that you cannot do if you children are being abused, to prove they are being abused:

• You may not take any more than five photos of your children and the Access Worker must view every single photo that is taken.
• You may not inspect your childrens body to take photos of bruises / rashes etc.
• You may not inspect your childrens hair for lice.

Attachments:

Charter of rights for Children and Young People in OOHC.pdf	[ ]
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child	[ ]
JIRT Physical Abuse Criteria Guidelines	[ ]
New Childrens Charter of Rights.pdf	[ ]
DoCS procedures for the use of Psychotropic medication for children in OOHC	[ ]
TAFE COURSE - Identify and Respond to Children and Young People at Risk	[ ]

Why is the Local MP Darren Weber not interested in assisting Marney MacDonald of Budgewoi, who resides within the Wyong Directorate in obtaining her file from DoCS after having shown them over one hundred and fifty breaches of administration and legislation and procedure and protocol after storming Gosford Hospital when her daughter was two hours old and removing her to the care of the state?

Luke from Darren Webers office advised Alecomm this morning that they have spoken to the Ministers Office and the FOI Section at Community Services and have been advised that it is not appropriate for them, nor is there any jursidiction for them to assist Marney with obtaining her file of over 1300 pages at a cost of $1600.  (More than $1 per page).

Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 - Section 127 states "An agency is entitled to waive, reduce or refund any fee or charge payable or paid under this Act in any case that the agency thinks appropriate, subject to the regulations.", and Miss MacDonald was merely asking for MP Darren Webers office to write a letter supporting the waiver of fees required to obtain her families file from Department of Community Services - but as Luke says "it's not the MPs job to help its constitutents".

Children of any age will be able to consent to Sterilisation: If a psychiatrist decides that a child (under 18 years) has sufficient maturity, he or she will be able to consent to sterilisation. Parental consent will not be needed. Only after the sterilisation procedure has been performed does it have to be reported and then only to the Chief Psychiatrist. [Pages: 135 & 136 of the Draft Mental Health Bill 2011]

12 year olds will be able to consent to psychosurgery -- WTF! Banned in N.S.W. and the N.T., psychosurgery irreversibly damages the brain by surgery, burning or inserting electrodes. This draft bill proposes to allow a 12 year old child, if considered to be sufficiently mature by a psychiatrist, to be able to consent to psychosurgery. Once the child has consented it goes before the Mental Health Tribunal (MHT) for approval. Parental consent is also not needed for the MHT to approve the psychosurgery. [Pages: 108, 109, 110, 197,198, 199, 213]

12 year olds will be able to consent to electric shock treatment (ECT): Electroshock is hundreds of volts of electricity to the head. Any child aged 12 and over, whom a child and adolescent psychiatrist decides is "mature" enough, will be able to consent to electroshock. Also, once consent is given, there is no requirement for parents or anyone, including the MHT, to approve the electroshock. Electroshock should be banned. Its use on the elderly, pregnant women and children is especially destructive. [Pages: 100, 101, 103, 104, 194, 105]

And after these procedures are performed, and the children are not happy - it will be okay to restrain and seclude these tortured victims : Children can be restrained in a psychiatric institution, with the use of mechanical restraint (manacles, belts, straps etc.) and bodily force. Chemical restraint - the use of psychiatric drugs to subdue and control the person - is not covered in the draft bill, so there are no legal safeguards to prevent its application. Death can result from all forms of restraint. [Pages: 122, 121, 113, 246]

This Department is being run by the heirechy as a children-for-profit child trafficking ring, where caseworkers are being trained in corruption along with court psychologists and childrens psychologists and psychiatrists. Unethical and immoral DoCS funded lawyers who are no less than glorified prostitutes who will destroy families for the almighty DoCs dollar.

Thousands of families, parents and grandparents are now speaking out in outrage regarding the huge financial incentives that are being offered to steal innocent children and place them in a fostercare system created to assist the governments forced surrogacy programme.

Every community services minister over the past 20 years been complicit, and aided and abetted this inhumane new world order scheme to steal children in order to line the pockets of the well to do.

Bring On Eureka Stockade

Re Brisbane Hearing where Four Government Departments are Protecting a Paedophile:

We got 12 good people whose presence there, we believe, ensured that the Court conducted itself properly for the most part.  The matter was adjourned for two weeks because it appears the Registry (presumably under pressure from above) had not placed the Court seal on the subpoenas issued to four key Government Departments - so-called 'Child Safety' , Police, Education and Health. 

Child Protection Should Be Thinking About The Welfare And Protection Of Children Instead Of Thiking About Their Power To Pretend They Are Judges

At Alecomm we have provided two examples of how the Ombudsman allows corruption to continue in NSW Child Protection due to his "ethical fatigue".  We apologise for not producing more articles over recent months.  In this article we will refer to a recent New Scientist article on why corruption occurs around the world. This article was written by world experts in corruption and in a well known and well respected public journal.  The article suggests that corruption is normal unless there are adequate safeguards: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228372.200-the-underhand-ape-why-corruption-is-normal.html

We sure know that is the case for DoCS don't we? Well why aren't their adequate safeguards against corruption given the amount of oversight we have.  Both the NSW ICAC and NSW Ombudsman have the responsibilities to investigate potential corruption. The only answer is these oversight agencies are morally corrupt themselves.