This Department is being run by the heirechy as a children-for-profit child trafficking ring, where caseworkers are being trained in corruption along with court psychologists and childrens psychologists and psychiatrists. Unethical and immoral DoCS funded lawyers who are no less than glorified prostitutes who will destroy families for the almighty DoCs dollar.

Thousands of families, parents and grandparents are now speaking out in outrage regarding the huge financial incentives that are being offered to steal innocent children and place them in a fostercare system created to assist the governments forced surrogacy programme.

Every community services minister over the past 20 years been complicit, and aided and abetted this inhumane new world order scheme to steal children in order to line the pockets of the well to do.

Bring On Eureka Stockade

Re Brisbane Hearing where Four Government Departments are Protecting a Paedophile:

We got 12 good people whose presence there, we believe, ensured that the Court conducted itself properly for the most part.  The matter was adjourned for two weeks because it appears the Registry (presumably under pressure from above) had not placed the Court seal on the subpoenas issued to four key Government Departments - so-called 'Child Safety' , Police, Education and Health. 

For those already privvy to the "Child Protection" system, you would already be aware that the Case Workers with DoCS or DCS or DCF or whatever they are, no matter where they are in the world get off on forcing kids to call carers "mum".  Its really quite sick and distressing particularly given how much most kids seem to shoved from pillar to post in the foster care system.  We at Alecomm know a (now) four year old boy who has had six "mums" since he was kidnapped from his own real mother.  You think thats not going to screw a kid up?

Whats even better is that they then force the children to call their real parents by their first name.  They even do it to grandmothers.  Having kids call their grandparents by their first name is just not on, not only does it confuse the child to no end, it is totally disrespectful.  If i had called my grandmother by her first name when i was a young child i would have been in a lot of trouble.  Having our apparent "child protection" workers, the ones that proclaim to care for kids, eforcing this type of behaviour is just plain low. 

Attachments:

Just how much money do Foster Carers get ???

[ ]

Child Protection Should Be Thinking About The Welfare And Protection Of Children Instead Of Thiking About Their Power To Pretend They Are Judges

At Alecomm we have provided two examples of how the Ombudsman allows corruption to continue in NSW Child Protection due to his "ethical fatigue".  We apologise for not producing more articles over recent months.  In this article we will refer to a recent New Scientist article on why corruption occurs around the world. This article was written by world experts in corruption and in a well known and well respected public journal.  The article suggests that corruption is normal unless there are adequate safeguards: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228372.200-the-underhand-ape-why-corruption-is-normal.html

We sure know that is the case for DoCS don't we? Well why aren't their adequate safeguards against corruption given the amount of oversight we have.  Both the NSW ICAC and NSW Ombudsman have the responsibilities to investigate potential corruption. The only answer is these oversight agencies are morally corrupt themselves.

A Happy New Year to Grace Adura and Staff at Eastern Sydney CSC (Community Services).   I hope that whilst you spent time partying hard and freely spending time with your own family, that you spared a thought for those of whom you denied christmas contact visits with.  What an awful office and even more so the staff.  Not surprising though as Eastern Sydney CSC happily stole a family of four from Victoria a few years ago and placed them with an extremely violent and deluded man who passes himself of as preacher - yet on his Foster Carer Application with Catholicare states he is a salesman.

The man recently had a meltdown where he broke through the bathroom door with a screwdriver looking like nothing less than a madman because the intellectually handicapped child whom Eastern Sydney CSC refuse to remove from his care, did not want to shower with Mr Cork (the carer) watching.  And rightfully so!  Where is this boys right to privacy and wouldn't this man be considered nothing less than a paedophile, forcing a young man to shower naked in front of him?

There is currently an enormous amount of children being removed from their homes because of domestic violence.  However there is no such evidence that the mother has ever harmed a hair on their child so why is the Department of Community Services putting these children into foster care, with a life sentence on them until they are eighteen years of age?

What happens when these children are taken from their families is that DOCs then seek authorisation from the Childrens Courts to have Parental Care of the child until they are eighteen years of age, and once they (easily) obtain this status, they give the mothers no more than 6 x 2 hour visits with their children each year --- FOR EIGHTEEN YEARS.

Attachments:

Domestic Violence Interagency Guidelines.pdf	[ ]
FORM 4 - Informing the Family Law Court about Child Abuse and Domestic Violence	[ ]
Apparent help given to Domestic Violence Victims instead of Forced Adoption	[ ]
AIC - Emerging issues in domestic/family violence research	[ ]

A Grandmother is currently a defendant being prosecuted by DoCS (Child Protective Services) for the crime of wanting to bring her grandchildren home.  Although it is not a crime to ask for guardianship of your grandchildren, the state will pay a prosecutor to take away the rights of grandparents and other family members to keep children in foster care and then adopt them out.

You have to ask yourself, why is the government of the country, that you are a citizen of and pay taxes to, prosecuting the grandmother this way?  She has committed no crime nor have has she been accused of one.  The grandmother was given three reasons by DoCS several months after the children were removed as to why they would not place them with her.

There have been no laws enacted since 4th December 1972 by “The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia”, i.e. the Legislature as constituted under the “Crown” of the United Kingdom under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act from 1st January 1901, inter alia with the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) [63 & 64 Vict.] [Ch. 12].  The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act from 1st January 1901, inter alia with the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) [63 & 64 Vict.] [Ch. 12] state at Chapter 1—The Parliament Part V—Powers of the Parliament - Section 51—Legislative Powers of the Parliament - The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to: (i) to (xxxix) e.g. with respect to the particular matters of “mediums of exchange” “of the Commonwealth,”

Judge or magistrate acting oppressively or when interested

Excessive and unreasonable bail

1.   A person commits an offence if:

1. the person is a judge or magistrate; and
2. the judge or magistrate is required or authorised by law to admit a person accused of an offence to bail; and
3. the judge or magistrate requires excessive and unreasonable bail; and
4. the requirement is an abuse of the judge's or magistrate's office; and
5. the offence referred to in paragraph (b) is an offence against a law of the Commonwealth.

Penalty:  Imprisonment for 2 years.

Hello Australia, do you see the similarity between this and other children? - Click here to view the YouTube Video in Reference.

The problem is the response on facebook is focused on retribution towards the perpetrator rather than the welfare, safety and development of the young boy.

Responses to child abuse should be focused on the welfare and development of the child. What was done for this child to ensure this wouldn't happen again? Autistic and developmentally delayed children that have "challenging behaviours" will always be at risk of harm until the behaviours are addressed. That is what 'challenging behaviours' is defined as. There are many people that cannot handle people of all ages with challenging behaviours including parents, carers, hospital staff (e.g. the recent death of a difficult patient in WA) and even police.

While it is important to highlight the situation it is even more important that focus remains on the victim's human rights and those rights include both the minimization of future harm and maximization of welfare and development.

(1) A person who takes or threatens to take detrimental actionagainst another person because that other person or any other person:

(a) makes, or proposes to make, a complaint to a service provider, an Official Community Visitor or the Ombudsman, or

(b) brings, or proposes to bring, proceedings before the Tribunal, or

(c) provides, or proposes to provide, information, documents or evidence to an Official Community Visitor, the Ombudsman or the Tribunal,

is guilty of an offence.

Maximum penalty: 50 penalty units or imprisonment for 12 months, or both.

Name Of Lawyer : Vera Temelkovska
Law Firm Your Lawyer Works For : Legal Aid Commission of NSW
Suburb Of Lawyer : Wollongong
State of Lawyer : NSW
Rating Of Lawyer : An absolute disgrace to the practice of law
Reason For Rating Of Lawyer :

This 'lawyer' was appointed ICL for a child who is 12.

The father has been in breach of orders that say the child is to reside with the mother for over 4 years, and the most recent breach commenced in January.

So much has been spoken, written, filmed and broadcast about the mental health of men, youth, asylum seekers and others. But there is a deafening silence about what’s happening to children caught up in the damaging and cruel Family Law system.

In Mental Health month 2011, Justice for Children Australia calls upon all governments to work together to protect all children, especially those silenced by the suppression orders in effect under Family Law. Family court decisions are placing children in serious jeopardy. They have to live in situations where they are subject to emotional, psychological and often physical and sexual abuse. After court rulings, they can be cruelly separated from their accustomed parent, home and extended family, without any preparation and may be forbidden to see the person who has been their primary carer (and who has not committed or even been accused of, any crime) or only allowed contact under extremely restricted circumstances.

Many children are forbidden to receive counselling or access to medical services By Order of the Court. This is a violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child – to which Australia is a signatory. It is child abuse.

We all know the HUMAN cost involved in Court proceedings in order to have our children returned to us.

The HUMAN cost to both parents/grandparents and children is undoubtably a mental scar that will never heal. The ongoing trauma, emotional damage and mental endurance that is placed on us in dealing with the brick wall that is built in a defensive negative aspect by the Department of Community Services NSW to review and return our children to their rightful place in life takes its toll on us mentally, physically and financially.

The Legal Aid system is unfair, unjust and one sided, it also fails to fund what is warranted to have evidence heard in the Courts regarding the positive side to returning our children. Almost all parents and grandparents will have experienced failure in the Children's Courts due to limited time and denial of evidence being viewed.

If Legal Aid is not available to take us to the next step of Court proceedings you will find yourself out of pocket at an average of $40,000, which can bring us into financial ruin and another round of stress.

How much have you suffered financially ?

How many of you have been refused Legal Aid?

How many of you have walked away with dying hearts due to the David & Goliath mentality of the system?

May 2011 denotes the month when Legal Aid assesses the suitability of solicitors and lawyers on the care panel for the Central Coast.  What this means is that if you are funded by Legal Aid, then you only have solicitors on the appropriate care panel to choose from to look after your case.

Central Coast Care Panel has ...

1. Stephen MARKS
2. Dennis CHAPMAN
3. Elizabeth MORAN
4. ???

There are another few solicitors whos names haven't popped up on the Alecomm registers yet, but these guys are definites that we want off the Care Panel, and the reasons for we have outlined below:

• Stephen MARKS has had numerous complaints to the NSW Law Society regarding his behaviour as Legal Aid Solicitor --- he also has been taken to the OLSC (Office of the Legal Services Commissioner) where he has a record for not being a particularly good solicitor.  On top of this, when a former client complained to the Law Society about him falling asleep on the bench, he then used his contacts to further prejudice a case in the supreme and district courts.
• Dennis CHAPMAN - well there are numeous articles on him on our site.  He is just a lazy old flop who cares much more about lining his pocket than he does actually doing his job.  He does not often go against the wishes of the department, which therefore renders him useless as both Client Rep and Child Rep, and when questioned of his ethics, he harasses former clients in public.  He has also refused to hand over documents to the parties after he terminated his representation.
  Read more... Comments (2)

If so, its no wonder things turned out bad for you...... They only need to help if they are ACCOUNTABLE. Since they control the media they can do what they like - just like what the Nazi propaganda machine did. Its been over half a century and the human race still has not learned the results of wide scale dishonest propaganda.

The process to get help is:

Public: Request Assistance from DoCS

DoCS: Make sure the chair is shiney

Public: Request Assistance from DoCS

DoCS: Tell you you are a bad parent and remove (or threaten to remove) your children

DoCS: Write reports fabricating the assistance they have provided in their dreamland state.

DoCS: In the real world, make sure their chairs don't get too dusty.

Public: Why have you got the word "Services" in the department name?

DoCS: OK - We'll change the department name and that will fix things.

Public: But its still got the word "Services" in it.

DoCS: Your case is closed and we are busy making sure our chairs are shiney.

Child protection reports for NSW DoCS comprised of 61% of all Child Protection Reports in Australia, and 79% of all Australian Child Protection Investigations, with notifications in NSW increasing every year for the past decade with DoCS receiving 309,676 reports in 2008/09.  

A government inquiry into child protection (Nov 2008) revealed that DOCS was swamped with notifications that didn’t warrant the department’s involvement, and in some cases children who actually were at risk were neglected, harmed or exploited (some cases resulted in the death of the child).

Children have also been removed from capable parents who often experience financial stress due to the cost of legal fees and/or court reports.

Big money can be made via DOCS intervention; child protection is now an industry. Private agencies make profits, foster agencies/parents make money, lawyers reap in the cash and the judicial system is continually at work. These financial gains bring with it corruption: the majority of funding is not being allocated to parenting classes or community development, instead going to caseworkers.

To whomever is willing to listen,

I am Tracy William and in 1996, when I was 20, I had my first child, Indiana. Her father and I separated when Indiana was about 2 and a half.  Her father, Anthony Toadies, is of Egyptian heritage and is very involved with not only the Egyptian community but also the Coptic Orthodox church (Egyptian christian).  Whilst together Anthony and I had planned to be married twice, both times I cancelled, subsequently humiliating him in front of the Egyptian community.  Shortly after separating from Anthony, I moved into a 3 bedroom house with Indiana, while Anthony continued to live at home with his mother and siblings. 

Attachments:

Family Law Court Rules - Contravention	[ ]
Family Law Court - Contravention Application	[ ]
Family Law Court of Australia - Parenting Questionairre	[ ]

Alecomm has been researching for the past two years about the rights of parents who have children who are in the care of the government  and that are being abused.  So what are the parents rights you wonder?  Most people would lead us to believe that the Childs Rights and Safety would be the most important concern, as is the common statements from all the government personnel involved in care, however it is very much different.

First of all, here are a few things that you cannot do if you children are being abused, to prove they are being abused:

• You may not take any more than five photos of your children and the Access Worker must view every single photo that is taken.
• You may not inspect your childrens body to take photos of bruises / rashes etc.
• You may not inspect your childrens hair for lice.

Attachments:

JIRT Physical Abuse Criteria Guidelines	[ ]
TAFE COURSE - Identify and Respond to Children and Young People at Risk	[ ]

Our Enemy are the judges ..... And they are a tyrannical and malevolent foe.

The Bill of Rights 1689 accurately calls them "EVIL" and that they are Hell-bent on destroying our laws and our liberties.

They have NO LEGITIMACY.... they are Frauds ... Their "appointments" are conspiratorially fabricated.

They do not hesitate to continually LIE.

They pervert and corrupt the course of justice.

They conceal and aid and abet the greatest crimes of theft and injury ever perpetrated against people and the environment.

They commit perjury and treason.

They regard themselves as immune from and above the law. 

It's true isn't it?  Because the government wouldn't just take kids from parents that hadn't done anything wrong to warrant removal..  Pru Goward even proves it because she continually states that "Removing a Child is a Last Resort", meaning that DoCS would have tried every possible means before ripping a child away from everybody and everything they know.  To remove a child you must have really fucked up.

Attachments:

Neoliberalism

[Neoliberalism and child protection: a deadly mix]

Rebecca Cartright from Department of Community Services at Cootamundra in Central NSW recently forced sterilised a mother whom had her newborn stolen with yet again out any evidence.  Rebecca Cartright told this mother that unless she had a hystorectomy she would be prevented from ever seeing her beautiful daughter "AMY" again.

Seems like Nazi Germany is still here and that Eugenics has forced its way back into this country again.  Sadly enough neither the Ombudsman nor the Minister for Community Services have any interest in dealing with the corrupt and blatant violations of human rights that exists each and every day within their department, as each plea for help goes ignored.

I, a man going by the name Chris, a free man, over the age of twenty-one years, competent to witness, do affirm and say that I have first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein:

I am husband to the woman known as My Imprisoned Wife.  I have been married to My Imprisoned Wife for 28 years.  My Imprisoned Wife began to show signs of her disability four years ago.  I believe this disability is still to be properly diagnosed and qualified.  I believe this to be a condition called post traumatic stress syndrome.  I alone have been caring for My Imprisoned Wife while she has this condition.  On 2nd March 2011 My Imprisoned Wife had an episode where she presented her anger and had to be restrained.  I believe her anger was the result of withdrawal symptoms after ceasing her medication.  This medication was ??????????. 

On the evening of 2nd March 2011 I made an attempt to contact by phone four different support groups but each call went to a message-bank.  In a state of exhaustion I contacted Nambour Hospital on 3rd March 2011 for overnight help so I could obtain a nights rest to recover from the previous night’s lack of sleep.  This error of judgment began a nightmare for My Imprisoned Wife and I as she has been a PRISONER OF THE STATE ever since ...

"The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled." Professor J. K. Galbraith

Do you know that no bank lends money deposited with it?

Do you know that when a bank lends money it CREATES IT OUT OF NOTHING - THIN AIR!

Do you know that bank loans are merely pen and ink entries in the credit columns of a bank's ledger? And these days, are simply pixels in a computer? THEY HAVE NO OTHER EXISTENCE!

Do you know that practically all the money in the community – and the country - comes into circulation as a debt to the banks?

Do you know that money loaned by a Government bank is just as much a debt to the people as if it were loaned from a private bank?

(1) When making a care application, the Director-General must furnish details to the Children’s Court of:

(a) the support and assistance provided for the safety, welfare and well-being of the child or young person, and

(b) the alternatives to a care order that were considered before the application was made and the reasons why those alternatives were rejected.

Read more... Add new comment

Life was fantastic.  My five year old sister and I had just finished swimming lessons.  Dad is great.  He takes us everywhere and gives us so many opportunities to learn and grow.  We love our swimming, it’s a beautiful freedom to be in the water powering along, feeling the confidence that achieving brings.  But that was about to change.  We arrived home to find 5 people waiting for us.  Some were policemen.  We were sent to the lounge, while the adults talked.  We were brought out and Dad said we were going on a 3 day holiday . I knew something was very wrong but I played along with it.

My sister and I had Mum & Dad quickly throw some clothes into a bag, and these strangers took us away.  We were not asked if we wanted to leave, nor were we told why we were being taken, but this started many long and horrifying weeks of captivity. We were taken to a strange house and told these were our new Mum & Dad.  There was even a new big sister.  That night I slept with the new sister in her room, and my sister slept in another room.  I couldn’t sleep.

The Department Of Community Services (inHuman Services) has covered all areas to ensure our complaints regarding Corruption / Victimisation / Bullying, and the basic human rights of our children in care, and keeps it well hidden from the public.

They take / steal / hide our children.  They pay untold amounts to DoCs Lawyers - The David & Goliath scene again.  They unethically blanket cover / diagnose thousands of parents / grandchildren / siblings with mental illness without a shred of evidence.  They Can Bully / Victimise and Alienate us from our Children.. But..... They cannot stop our right to protest outside their offices.  Would you like support for your Protest outside your allocated DoCS Office ? Please contact the volunteers here.

They raped and buggerised the child migrants.  They raped and stole the children of the forgotten australians.  They stole a whole generation of indigenous chidren.  And the bastards are at it again. New South Wales ... Stealing another generation of innocent australian children.

"A free people ought not only be armed and disiplined, but should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government" (George Washington)

Two individuals who are not the parents of two Australian children have been awarded full parenting rights of a 10yr old boy and a 13yr old girl.

The mother of the two children who is resident of Saratoga New South Wales, Australia, consented to the children having a holiday in September 2010 with their elder sister who lives in another state. The elder sister is 30yrs old and was said to be separated from her husband who is 48yrs old.

The elder sisters husband is a twice convicted criminal with 4 counts of peodophilic activity as part of his criminal record. She, the elder sister has an extensive criminal record for matters of deception. The elder sisters record was at the time, not known to the mother of the children.

The children were never returned to their mother.

If any of you are wondering why you are getting completely f**ked up the a**e by the Childrens Courts even after you gain an Appeal in the District Court ... here is the reason why!

Some piece of shit made the District Courts not follow the Rules of Evidence when it is related to the Childrens Court!

You know what this means dont you? 

Even after those scumbag DoCS Workers lie their arses off and steal your children on their bullshit lies and are not able to be cross-examined on them in Childrens Court, (because DoCS Workers only tell the truth) and thats why what they say is THE TRUTH - the Rules of Evidence DO NOT APPLY IN DISTRICT COURT.

So basically you have to wait all those years to get your matter heard in Supreme Court to be able to get any justice, or your children back, if they're not dead already, because nothing that a DoCS Worker says has to be proven until Supreme Court.

If the Family Law system via the Federal Magistrates Court can apply extensive understanding, compassion and opportunities for natural justice and appeal to its employees (e.g. Magistrate Joe Harman) – why can’t its clients be given the same allowances?

Justice for Children is particularly concerned about the belittling, bullying and plain inhumane treatment parents (mothers, mainly) and children often experience in the Family Court system.

Mothers who try to protect their children are labelled ‘mad’, ‘delusional’, ‘too clever’, over-anxious, depressed too loud, too emotional, too calm and variations on all these - and worse - insults.

All of this opinion may be generated by a court-appointed ‘expert’ who has spent, perhaps, one hour with the mother in question.

Or it may be home-grown bias from the judge’s personal store.

There is absolutely no accountability in Family Law – judges who are suffering from dementia and other ailments continue to wreak havoc on children and even if there’s nothing clinically wrong with them, their inability to listen or understand and their ingrained prejudices make them a danger to justice.

Especially any kind of justice for children.

We are writing a very serious message to you.  We know the personal politics of many of you, others we don't know, but regardless of your political stance, PLEASE read this message through carefully.

You are aware that a referendum in July will ask you to vote for a new Qld. Constitution & it will be sold to you in glowing terms, but please know that if this referendum is won by government it will literally turn Qld into a republic where there will be NO COMMON LAW...THERE WILL BE NO  PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF LAND OR WATER.  THAT MEANS THE HOME YOU THINK  IS YOURS STANDS ON LAND OWNED BY THE GOVERNMENT.  ANY "AUTHORITY" CAN WALK ON  TO YOUR LAND AND THEY WILL NOT BE TRESPASSING, & THEY CAN DO AS THEY PLEASE.  You will NOT own your land.  Nor can you own any body of water.  That's just one aspect of this new constitution they won't be telling you about.

Reports are coming into us from across Europe indicating that the EU States domestic and EU judiciary are no longer issuing judgements in corrupt cases since July 2010 changes in ECHR law.

This is now blocking citizens from an answer, appeal and the remedy of Human Rights violations that occur during proceedings from being heard in any court of law in Europe altogether.

The ECHR have removed Article 6 “The right to a fair trial” from being heard as a stand alone application before the ECHR by making all cases inadmissible that carry the Article 6 violation alone within the ECHR competence at the admissibility decision stage.

This law change occurred in July 2010 in order to deal with the massive number of UK applications to the ECHR that had to be placed in a special large room.

95% of these applications according to the ECHR are missing a vital document.