ALECOMM

"Senior Mentoring Solicitor for NSW Children's Court Blames Mother for Sexual Abuse of Daughter."

Details

Category: Uncategorised

Created: Sunday, 26 August 2012 13:09

Written by Alecomm2

Kim Rowley, senior instructing solicitor for the Children's Court Independent Children's Lawyer Mentoring Program has recently objected to a newborn being left in the care of its mother.  The reason being that the mother rang the NSW Police and had her ex-husband charged after another sibling disclosed sexual abuse by her father.

As it stands, Kim Rowley - Independent Children's Representative for the newborn firmly states that the mother was not protective of her older child because of the sexual abuse  - so this is good enough reason for her to deny the newborn its mother, its mothers breastmilk, and its mothers love and security.

Children are quite often taken from parents because the Department of Community Services states that the parents haven't "Engaged the Services", however prior to the birth of the child, the mother actively and repeatedly tried to engage the services and was ignored each time.  The mother wanted to ensure her baby would be safe from the abuse of the system but, yet again, as she "engaged" the services, the services removed her child. 

In this case, before the sexual abuse of the older sibling, the mother only had part parental control of the child, with the Department of Community Services retaining the last say - which is exactly how they like it.  So when the mother was forced by the Department of Community Services to send the older girl to visit her violent father - the mother objected to it being unsupervised.  The mother tried very hard to protect her child but the department prevented her from doing this and made her hand over her child unsupervised, against her wishes, to the violent abusive father whom she left some years earlier.

Not long after the child disclosed of the abuse, the mother phoned the police, as any normal protective mother would do and proceeded to have the father charged.

A few days later, in the middle of the night, the Department of Community Services turned up accompanied by armed police officers to forcibly remove the children.  
{module Who's at fault ?}

Their reason being that the new husband had possibly sexually assaulted the child.  (One hell of a big fat lie).

The department and Joint Investigative Response Team (NSW Police) investigated the matter and as a result have laid two aggravated sexual assault charges against the father of the girl (not the new husband).

Now that the new husband has been exhonerated, and instead of apologising profusely for what they did, they are blaming the mother for the sexual abuse of her own daughter and using this as the reason not to return the children.

Now there's a newborn baby, and he too has been taken and shoved into the foster care system becuase of these evil lying thugs who claim they do no wrong.  Kim Rowley sits by and supports the actions of the department because she loves the hefty pay packet that she receives being part of the  child trafficking ring in NSW known as Department of Communiy Services - you know - the same department responsible for the Stolen Generation, the quarter of a million children whom were taken from unmarried mothers and the tolen trafficked migrants who were sold as slave labour and sexual toys for the rich in the mid 1920's.

Now there's (apparently) systems in place to prevent this from happening - and to determine "independently" what the best wishes of the child should be, and its done with Independent Children's Representatives.  How does Kim Rowley sleep at night?  How can she actually sit there, knowing the whole case, as she does, and argue that the children are better off in foster care?  Its the departments fault that the child was sexuall assaulted - not the mother - and they bloody well know it.

{jd_file category==10 count==0}