fbpx

"Is Departmental Child Support Fraud committed more by the Department than the other Party?"

unfair wrong incorrect 23715The California Department of Child Support Services in Kings County (as well as in every other county in California) job is to assist in obtaining and enforcing child support orders. However …. the State of CA has a dirty little secret.

When you apply for welfare you must go to the DCSS (Department of Child Support Services) and assist them in obtaining a support order against the absent parent (usually the father).  In any case, you can tell them the father is Mickey Mouse and as it was explained to us by both the multiple DCSS' - they take a name and an approximate age then match it in the DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles) and look for five matches. And here comes the tricky part :

And we will use this story as an example ... A husband and wife married in mid December, but the husband moved in with the wife in mid to late October. On may 12, 2009 we received (my husband) a statement from the KINGS COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT DEPARTMENT showing he owed 326.00 for the prior month and owed over 2000.00 in back child support.  The husband assumed it was a mistake.  After a little arm twisting he called then to ask what the statement was for.

Their response was that he has a court order against him in KINGS COUNTY for the  $326 plus back child support.  They gave the husband a woman’s name.  He didn’t know the name.  The husband still thinking that KINGS COUNTY DCSS was being upfront and honest asked them what to do. They told him basically they he couldn’t really do anything but request a paternity test.   And he did.   Now remember we told you the first item received was on May 12 2009.   After several contacts with them and the other DCSS it seems that in February of 2009 he was served.  They were very confused, as nobody ever came to the house to serve the husband with the paperwork one would assume would be required to make a Child Support Order valid.  Nobody ever came to his work either.

The husband requested that a copyof  who / where the service took place happened be sent to him.  He came to find out they served his ex-wife at her house. 

His ex-wife has no obligation to turn it over to the husband.  And to date she never has mentioned it to him. 

The DCSS was made aware of it and their response to me … and we quote, “we can serve the absent parent even if its not at their address anymore.  We don’t have to make an effort to find them”.  

So in essence, Department of Child Support Services they have their own set of rules which the law doesn’t apply to.  Back to the court order ...  It was signed on April 14, 2009.  Ironically the statement was sent to the victims home less than a month after the statement was signed.  Had they checked his address with Department of Motor Vehicles (which we believe they knew the husbands address the entire time) the husband could have responded to the order.

Teresa A. Merzoian and many other, the Supervision Attorneys are ultimately responsible for Child Support and Welfare Fraud!  We believe that the motive, which with much research is happening all over is because of welfare.  In every case we have read about the other parties seem to be receiving PUBLIC ASSISTANCE.  The State of California wants money and they will bend the laws to do it. (Source : http://irrv15.wordpress.com/)

Comments

+1 #2 missjacci 2012-07-20 07:28
already commented,above
+1 #1 missjacci 2012-07-20 07:26
:Dthat not funny,same situation here in australia,north ern territory.child support gave my child 2 my ex.and I paying enomous amount of backpay,which child support can't produce the edivence.plus child support haven't got my taxable income right,they just make whatever they want.I 51 years old and have 2 work 2 jobs 2 survive.I ask questions child support don't answer them..had government look in2 the matter,child support talked their way out of all questions relating 2 my case.had enough.tired and want 2 live life.ex is a government worker here 4 powerwater(elec trical company)earns 3 times the amount I do , owes 2 homes ( 1 rental)and alienated me against my kids

You must be logged in to comment due to spam issues.