Pedophiles in Politics: An Open Source Investigation

As 2015 begins, high-profile cases involving accusations of pedophilia in the highest ranks of political power are making headlines on both sides of the Atlantic.

MPs Caught in Pedophile Network

The first case involves the exposure of five VIP pedophile rings operating in Britain in the 1970s and 80s that have been researched in a dossier compiled by John Mann, an MP for Bassetlaw in the Midlands, which was then submitted to the London Metropolitan Police for further investigation. These five rings all included at least one current or former member of parliament, with a total of 24 politicians having been identified in Mann’s dossier. Six of those 24 are currently serving members of the UK government, including three MPs and three members of the House of Lords. As an MP himself, Mann enjoys parliamentary privilege to name the accused politicians in the House of Commons but has said he will not do so because he believes the accusations should be investigated by police first.

The Met are already investigating claims made by an alleged victim of the network that a Conservative MP strangled a boy to death during one of the ring’s sex parties, and that he personally witnessed two other boys murdered by the gang, including one who was run over in broad daylight. Mann has also indicated that he believes two men may have been murdered as part of a cover-up of the network’s activities.

Dutch TV cancels Dr Phil after airing episode exposing elite paedophilia

“Dr. Phil” has been on television since 2002 and made Dr. Phillip McGraw one of the most prominent mental health professionals in the world.

Recently, however Dutch company RTL has decided to pull the plug on the Dr. Phil Show, and the timing of this action couldn’t be any more suspicious.

Only a week ago, Dr. Phil had aired a show where he interviewed a woman who claimed to have been trafficked around the world, to the most elaborate events and parties, as a sex slave for rich and powerful men.

British PM Theresa May: Paedophiles will be allowed to adopt Children too

With Theresa May on truly shaky ground as the present Conservative leader and British Prime Minister, details of an executive order she made that would give more rights to child abusers, has come to light.

May had ordered a review of current legislation that would prevent pedophiles from adopting children claiming that it was a "breach of their human rights".

One of May's arguments for the change in policy was that although pedophilia is on the rise, the number of pedophiles that murder children was "still quite low".

British PM Theresa May: pedophiles should be allowed to adopt

Newly appointed British Prime Minister Theresa May ordered a review on whether pedophiles should be allowed to adopt children in order to “not breach their human rights”.

Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, spurred the then Home Secretary to relax the rules which bans sex offenders from caring for children.

Telegraph.co.uk reports:

In an article in the respected Child and Family Law Quarterly, Miss Reece suggested that reoffending rates were not high among sex criminals, adding: “despite growing public concern over paedophilia, the numbers of child sex murders are very low.”

Lord Janner 'abused his position as an MP to sexually assault 30 victims at hotels and children's homes from 1955 to 1988', inquiry into historic abuse hears

Lord Janner is alleged to have exploited children to commit a 'full range' of sexual offences against them dating back to the 1950s, the public inquiry into child abuse has been told.

The late politician was said to have arranged for children 'in whom he had a sexual interest' to be brought to the Houses of Parliament. 

He died aged 87 in December, just days after he was found unfit to stand trial over historical child sex claims.

Ex-firefighter avoids prison despite having 'worst child abuse material' police officer had ever seen

 
Andrew Stenhouse, also known as Joe
PHOTO 

Andrew Stenhouse said he watched the child abuse for "emotional respite".

ABC NEWS: AVANI DIAS

A former Darwin fire commander has escaped jail time for possessing what police described as some of the worst child abuse videos they had ever seen.

Andrew Stenhouse, 58, also known as Joe, pleaded guilty to possessing eight child abuse videos, with two rated in the worst category of child abuse material and the other six in the second most severe category.

Justice Peter Barr told the court the worst category included depictions of "torture, cruelty or abuse of children" and the second-worst category included "penetrative sexual activity between adults and children".

He also said one police investigator had described the material as the "worst example of child abuse material" they had seen and found it "difficult and distressing" to view.

But Stenhouse walked free from court after Justice Barr reduced his sentence from 12 months to nine months for cooperating with investigations and pleading guilty at an early stage.

The nine-month sentence was then fully suspended.

Attempt by Stenhouse 'to seek emotional respite'

The court heard Stenhouse had downloaded other files containing child abuse material that had been deleted from his hard drive and could not be recovered by police.

Justice Barr said in a psychiatric evaluation Stenhouse had said he viewed the child abuse videos and other material - objects being blown up and people being killed - in an attempt to seek "emotional respite".

The court heard at the time Stenhouse was concerned about health issues after being diagnosed with a high level of PFOS - a controversial chemical previously used in firefighting foam currently being investigated by Australian and international authorities.

Stenhouse was also affected by a fatal accident that occurred between an aviation firetruck and a car which occurred on his watch as commander.

"I fail to understand how the type of material referred to in the facts [or] videos of things being blown up and people being killed could possibly have given you any possible emotional respite," Justice Barr said.

But he said there was no evidence Stenhouse had a psychosocial disorder or sought sexual gratification by watching the videos.

Shame and embarrassment to act as deterrent

Justice Barr also said he took into account that Stenhouse had not paid for the videos, had a low amount of them, had deleted them after watching them and had stopped accessing them at the time of his arrest.

"You had not accessed child abuse material for some two months prior to the police search last year," he said.

"You were no longer an active participant in this activity."

Justice Barr also told the court "the shame and embarrassment [Stenhouse] experienced ... and [his] public humiliation subsequently" would also act as deterrents.

Stenhouse will be subject to ongoing reporting and supervision under the Child Protection Act.

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-04/darwin-ex-firefighter-walks-free-despite-guilt-over-child-abuse/8497198?pfmredir=sm

MP ‘was at snuff film lad’s murder’

VIP paedophile horror forms centre of investigation in Dutch cops' probe

DETECTIVES probing the Westminster paedophile ring are investigating bombshell
evidence that an MP was involved in the murder of a child in a snuff movie.

A young boy sold for sex is said to have died in a torture session filmed at Amsterdam’s notorious Blue Boy vice club.

Allegations that the unnamed MP was present can be revealed today. The claims mean police are now investigating FOUR child murders linked to the alleged abuse ring.

Informants said the MP was present at the murder after going to Holland for sex with boys supplied by paedo fixer Warwick Spinks.

Met detectives are now re-examining files on Spinks amid claims he was a regular visitor to Elm Guest House, where the alleged systematic abuse of children sparked the original VIP inquiry in 2012.

Boys were allegedly taken to the guest house in Barnes, South-West London, and Dolphin Square flats near Westminster, to have sex with VIPs and MPs including Cyril Smith.

Yesterday it emerged that police who investigated Spinks in the 1990s were told a boy had died at the club while the MP was present.

A source said: “Officers were told Spinks knew the MP and arranged a tour to Amsterdam. While there he went to the Blue Boy bar, where Spinks was running a brothel.

“The MP was said to have been present when a boy died during an orgy which was being filmed. The information was not confirmed and the MP’s identity never surfaced.

“However, clear evidence that boys were tortured was discovered.”

Spinks was jailed in 1995 for sex offences, including abducting a boy of 14and taking him to Amsterdam.

Evidence from the Spinks investigation is now being analysed by the Met’s three-pronged probe into networks of VIP paedophiles.

The team are already probing three other alleged child murders, one by a Tory MP.

The families of two boys believed to have been murdered by Sidney Cooke’s paedophile gang are also urging police to investigate possible links to the VIP ring.

Police were last night accused of covering up claims that a senior MP abused a boy at a gay brothel.

The victim is said to have named the MP when interviewed by detectives probing claims of abuse at the Elm Guest House in the 1980s.

But his claim — heard by a social worker — was allegedly left out of his statement after Special Branch or MI5 intervened to protect the MP.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

PAEDOPHILE STORY

1

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Source : https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/580588/mp-was-at-snuff-film-lads-murder/

What is the Heiner Affair?

The Heiner affair is the long-running controversy surrounding the Goss cabinet's 1990 shredding of documents relating to child abuse - including the rape of a 14-year-old Aboriginal girl - after it aborted an inquiry into the former John Oxley Youth Detention Centre. 

The documents had been compiled during an inquiry headed by former magistrate Noel Heiner that was set up in the final days of the Cooper conservative government in 1989. 

The complaint to the Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Committee (PCMC) was lodged by former union official Kevin Lindeberg in February 2008 and concerned the handling of the Heiner affair by the main corruption watchdog, the Crime and Misconduct Commission (CMC) and its predecessor body, the Criminal Justice Commission (CJC).

Attached to the application for review was a nine-volume audit produced by Sydney QC David Rofe that contains details of 68 alleged prima facie charges that he believes could be brought against public officials past and present.

They include Prime Minister Kevin Rudd - Mr Goss's former chief-of-staff - the Governor-General Quentin Bryce, who took no action after requesting and receiving a report on the affair from then Premier Peter Beattie in 2003, and six serving Queensland judicial officers.

The review application to the PCMC also included a statement of concern sent to Mr Beattie in 2007 from legal heavyweights, including the former Chief Justice of Western Australia David Malcolm. 

The former Chief Justice of Australia, the late Sir Harry Gibbs, had previously aired his concerns at the destruction of documents.

Most recently, Premier Anna Bligh received a letter from Buckingham Palace, dated November 26, 2008, noting the Queen's request for "consideration" to be given to matters raised in letters to Her Majesty by Mr Lindeberg.

Source : http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/what-is-the-heiner-affair-20090428-alxz.html

Aston Hall, Dr Kenneth Milner, child sex abuse and human experimentation

Naughty kids ‘injected with truth serum and sexually assaulted at mental hospital to make them “normal”.

POLICE are investigating a massive alleged abuse scandal against a late doctor at a mental hospital where children were drugged and chucked into padded cells to be made “normal”.

Brisbane barrister pleads guilty to making child porn

Stephen James Keliher ‘sought relationships with real human children for sexual gratification’.

A FORMER Queensland barrister spent last night behind bars after pleading guilty to making child pornography and sharing it on the "dark web".

Stephen James Keliher, 55, from Annerley, wrote stories about his experiences of paedophilia and shared hundreds of "depraved and degrading" child-porn videos and images, the Brisbane Supreme Court heard.

The 'right’ to sleep with children was one 'civil liberty’ that NCCL supported

The Seventies was an era of sudden sexual emancipation. To some on the Left, sex with children was just another boundary to be swept away.

The first chapter of Tom O’Carroll’s book reads a little like a romantic novel, as the author describes his “special friendship” with a “raven-haired little charmer”, spoiled only by the “stupid, blind, socially programmed” parents who “come between” them.

In other places, it’s like soft porn, with fairly graphic descriptions of nudity and sex. (“I knew my little naked body didn’t look like anything… but Uncle Herman looked at me as if I were Sophia Loren,” gushes a female contributor.)

There are, however, several important differences. The book, a manifesto for the legalisation of sex with children, is called Paedophilia: The Radical Case. O’Carroll was a teacher, and the “raven-haired little charmer” was one of his pupils, an 11-year-old schoolboy called Chris. Uncle Herman was in his fifties, and the girl he had sex with was 12.

But most unusually of all, O’Carroll’s foreword, with its passionate plea not to “deny children their sexual life, including the possibility of sexual contact with adults”, expresses his “heartfelt thanks” to those who helped him write his rallying-call, “especially… Ms Nettie Pollard of the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL) [who] read the whole text in draft and made many helpful suggestions”.

O’Carroll had been a “sexually predatory” paedophile, “determined to find a boy, or boys, for what I assured myself would be mutually pleasurable and affectionate sex… All I had to do was pop out to the nearest canal bank, or swimming baths, or park.” After this didn’t work, he “rained letters” on Chris, then turned up on the child’s doorstep “emboldened by drink, and aggressive with it”. O’Carroll was any parent’s darkest nightmare.

Yet at the time this book was published, in 1980, O’Carroll and the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) – a body founded to openly lobby for child sex – were part of NCCL, now Liberty, Britain’s foremost mainstream civil rights organisation.

Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against his former friend and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein who had 'regular' orgies at his Caribbean compound that the former president visited multiple times

  • The former president was friends with Jeffrey Epstein, a financier who was arrested in 2008 for soliciting underage prostitutesNaming names: A lawsuit between Jeffrey Epstein (right) and his legal team has included multiple mentions about the convicted pedophile's connection to former President Bill Clinton (left)
  • A new lawsuit has revealed how Clinton took multiple trips to Epstein's private island where he 'kept young women as sex slaves'
  • Clinton was also apparently friends with a woman who collected naked pictures of underage girls for Epstein to choose from
  • He hasn't cut ties with that woman, however, and invited her to Chelsea's wedding
  • Comes as friends now fear that if Hillary Clinton runs for president in 2016, all of their family's old scandals will be brought to the forefront
  • Epstein has a host of famous friends including Prince Andrew who stayed at his New York mansion AFTER his arrest

It has revealed the extent of former President Clinton's friendship with a fundraiser who was later jailed for having sex with an underage prostitute.

Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, who served time in 2008 for his illegal sexual partners, included up multiple trips to the onetime billionaire's private island in the Caribbean where underage girls were allegedly kept as sex slaves. 

Malcolm Turnbull, Paedophilia & Pornography: 8 Disturbing Connections

Australia’s current Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, has a long history of disturbing activities and associations with regard to sexual morality. As a result of a sympathetic left-wing media, this is something the broader Australian public knows nothing about.

1. Supporting Naked Child Photographer, Bill Henson

In May 2008, following complaints from the public, NSW Police raided a so-called “art exhibition” in the Sydney suburb of Paddington, and confiscated about 20 photographs of naked children. The so-called “artist” responsible for the photos is Bill Henson, a well-known photographer. It was later discovered that Henson had travelled to primary schools to hunt down potential “models” for his “art”.

If you can stomach it, click here to see two examples of Henson’s “work”.

Liberal Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson said the photographs violate Australian values, and Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd described them as “revolting”. On the other hand, the then Shadow Treasurer, Malcolm Turnbull, vigorously defended Bill Henson and attacked the police. He said the police should stay out of art galleries, and suggested that naked photos of children should be accepted as part of “artistic freedom”.


2. Defending Pro-Paedophile Organisations

The Spycatcher case was a 1980s legal case in Australia concerning the publication of a book by former MI5 intelligence officer, Peter Wright.

spycatcher-the-candid-autobiography-of-a-senior-intelligence-officer-peter-wright-viking-0670820555The British Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher argued that the book threatened national security, and shouldn’t be published.

Wright’s publishers hired Turnbull as their lawyer, and in pushing the case for the book’s publication, Turnbull tried to argue that MI5 was illegally surveilling innocent organisations, and suppressing whistle-blowers like Wright. He cited the surveillance of, among others, the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL).

NCCL was involved in supporting the paedophile liberation movement, and was officially affiliated with British pro-paedophile organisations like the ‘Paedophile Information Exchange‘ and ‘Paedophile Action for Liberation‘.

Turnbull though defended NCCL, characterising them as a harmless “civil libertarian” organisation, saying they:

“…could not, on the wildest and most paranoid view, be regarded as dangerous subversives menacing the Constitution.”1

Turnbull suggested MI5 were trying to suppress legitimate political dissent, and particularly fretted about NCCL General-Secretary Patricia Hewitt being surveiled by MI5. Hewitt, during her time with the NCCL, had called for the age-of-consent for sexual intercourse to be lowered to as young as 10 years old, and for incest to be decriminalised.


turnbull_playboy3. Bringing Porno Magazines to Australia

In 1978, acting for his client, Australian Consolidated Press, Turnbull travels to the US to organise a deal to produce an Australian version of the American pornographic magazine, Playboy.

Having long defended pornography as a young journalist, including a major pro-porn, anti-Liberal 1975 article for the Nation Review,8 Turnbull was no doubt considered the appropriate person for the job.

He meets Playboy Enterprises vice-president Christie Hefner, daughter of Hugh, at the original Playboy mansion in Chicago, and a deal is successfully negotiated.

This was at a time when Playboy was regularly producing sickening material, including simulated child pornography, promotions of films containing child pornography and paedophilia scenarios, as well as cartoons depicting paedophilia, rape, incest and bestiality, among other things.

The research of Dr. Judith Reisman meticulously documents Playboy‘s nefarious material from the 1950s to the 1980s, and is a disturbing read. Dr. Reisman showed that, between 1953 and 1982, Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler magazines published a combined total of approximately 9,000 images containing sexual scenarios involving children as sexual objects. This amounted to an average of about 8 images per issue, and Reisman concludes that these cartoons are used for conditioning people to accept paedophilia and adult-child sexual relations.

There were even cases of Playboy publishing true child pornography.

One case involved nude, sexualised photos of 10-year-old child actress Brooke Shields, appearing in a 1976 Playboy-published photo-book titled “Sugar and Spice” (pictured).

sugar_spice2In another case, the October 1976 Italian Edition of Playboy featured nude, sexualised photos of 11 year-old French child actress, Eva Ionesco. Eva later sued her mother for allowing Playboy to publish the photos.

But it gets worse.

Playboy actually published editorial material promoting the idea that children are capable of sexual activity from birth. For instance, in the October 1976 American edition, under the title “Kid Stuff”, Playboy promoted Floyd Martinson, a charlatan academic who promoted adult-child sex. Playboy said the following:

“…the big news is that there is a lot more direct eroticism flowing through a small child’s body than most adults are willing to acknowledge. According to Martinson, girl babies can achieve vaginal lubrication and boy babies can have erections virtually from birth. Furthermore, he points out that the potential for erotic sensuality is present when the child is in the womb. And here’s the real startler to make you have second thoughts about your wasted youth: Some boys have been observed enjoying the indescribable pleasure of orgasm as early as their first birthday.”

Another example was a book review in the June 1978 edition of Playboy. The book being reviewed was titled “Sex Without Shame: Encouraging the Child’s Healthy Sexual Development” by Alayne Yates M.D., another pseudo-scholar. The review says:

“Yates…makes a telling point in the first few paragraphs: Children come into the world fully equipped to enjoy sex. Most male babies are born with erections. Female babies lubricate vaginally in the first four to six hours of life. Masturbation culminating in climax may occur as early as the first month of life. Children are sensuous beings (it is no mistake that Cupid – the god of love – is depicted as a child)…If enough people read this book, we might actually make the world safe for eroticism.”

Further, adjacent to the article there is an image of a children’s alphabet block with a naked women’s torso on one side, with the horrifying caption “Sex Without Shame: never too young“. I’ve scanned the relevant page, which you can view by clicking here (SFW).


More disturbing are the number of SBS films depicting paedophilia and teen sex. I’ve listed a few here, again with accompanying screen grabs:

4. Porn & Paedophilia on SBS: Turnbull Did Nothing

As Communications Minister, Malcolm Turnbull was responsible for the public broadcaster, SBS. Despite this, he did absolutely nothing about the continuous stream of pornographic filth that appears on this taxpayer-funded network.

Some of the films & programs appearing on SBS in the past two years include:

(WARNING: I’ve linked to explicit screenshots from these programs so you can clearly see what your tax dollars are funding.)

  • Strippers Vs Werewolves – It sounds like a joke but it isn’t. It’s a real film, and your tax dollars are funding it.
  • Lesbian Vampire Killers – As above.
  • Masters of Sex – A drama series promoting “sexologist” quackery, that is little more than an excuse to show explicit sex and nudity.
  • Sex In The World’s Cities – A series so obscene I could barely watch a single episode, which included a repulsive mocking of nuns.
  • Sex with Sunny Megatron – Another obscene series that includes segments on “water sports”, “anal play” and “tranny sex”.
  • The Feed – A show with segments on “vaginal knitting“, “fetish fitness” and many other vile topics.
  • 101 Reykjavík – A film about a man who has incestuous fantasies about his lesbian mother, and then impregnates her lover.
  • The Night Porter – A film about a holocaust survivor who meets her Nazi captor later in life & renews their sadomasochistic relationship.
  • Cold Showers – About teens who have a threesome in the school gym. Contains explicit sex, full frontal nudity, and a scene of a girl wiping semen from her leg.
  • Lila Says – About a foul-mouthed 16-year-old nymphomaniac.
  • Fish Tank – About a 15-year-old girl who has a sexual relationship with her mother’s boyfriend (who was otherwise married with children). Includes scene of girl urinating on a lounge room floor.

Perhaps the most disturbing film of all on SBS, is a Mexican film called Memories of my Melancholy Whores. It is the film adaptation of a book in which the protagonist, a 90-year-old man, has an ongoing melancholy-whoressexual relationship with a 14-year-old girl.

In the book, published in 2004, it is explicitly stated that the girl is 14-years-old, but her age in the 2011 film adaptation is left unstated (although a character is one scene guesses she is 15). This change appears to have been a response to protests against the film by Mexican anti-paedophilia campaigners during filming.

Furthermore, SBS actually deceives potential critics by stating in their description of the movie that the girl is 20 years old, when this appears nowhere in the film.

All of aforementioned films and programs continue to appear on the SBS website, and when you further consider that Turnbull allowed SBS to:

  • Show advertisements for the adultery-promoting website Ashley Madison
  • Block advertisements by anyone opposing so-called “gay marriage
  • Pay comedians to write endless satire articles attacking conservatives

…a very disturbing picture emerges.


5. Sydney Homosexual Mardi Gras Attendee

Turnbull is an attendee at the

Turnbull with lesbian ABC presenter Fran Kelly @ the 2015 Sydney Mardi Gras.

annual Sydney Mardi Gras, an event that harbors and celebrates some very disturbing groups and individuals.

Peter Tatchell, for instance, is a veteran British/Australian homosexual activist and UK Greens Party member, who told The Guardian newspaper in June, 1997 that:

The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the age of 9 to 13.  None feel they were abused.  All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy.  Whilst it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted abusive and harmful.”

This was in the context of defending a book called “Dares to Speak: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Boy-love“, which was edited by Joseph Geraci, an editor of the pro-paedophilia journal, Paidika.

Left: Sydney Mardi Gras honours Peter Tatchell. Right: Tatchell’s letter in the Guardian newspaper.

Tatchell has also campaigned to lower the age-of-consent in Britain; suggested that school children should be taught fellatio and cunnilingus; and even wrote a chapter for a book by a former Vice President of the Paedophile Information Exchange, a British pro-paedophile organisation.

The 2011 Sydney Mardi Gras officially celebrated Tatchell as a hero of the homosexual movement.

Another disturbing participant in the Sydney Mardi Gras is the Sydney Leather Pride Association. This organisation’s website contained a guide on how to inexplicitly signal your willingness to engage in pederasty (sex between a man and an adolescent boy) and bestiality.

There are also floats promoting polyamory, but despite his attendance, Turnbull claims these people don’t exist. He says:

“There is no demand, no lobby, no support, no constituency for legalising polygamy under the Marriage Act.”

Perhaps Turnbull missed the explicitly pro-polyamory floats that have featured in numerous Sydney Mardi Gras, including 2011, 2012, 2014 and 2015.


Turnbull performs his own routine, with a double entendre about the “good member” for Maranoa, Bruce Scott, as he is kissed by men in leather outfits.  All of this takes place in front of children.

6. Sex Jokes in Front of Children

In April of this year, Turnbull attended an obscene homosexual/transvestite party at the Birdsville Hotel in remote western Queensland, where he made filthy jokes alongside a drag queen comedian named ‘Sofia’.

Among other things, the drag queen asks the audience to “show us your tits and i’ll show you mine” and uses a meowing cat figurine to make double entendre jokes about “pussies” that “moan back”.

Click here to see the video.


7. Turnbull’s Comrades:  Keneally, Kirby & Kinsey

Malcolm Turnbull associates himself with some disturbing people. Author Thomas Keneally, for instance, is a very close associate of Turnbull’s, and a fellow Australian Republican Movement co-founder. Turnbull calls him “beaming and brilliant“, and in 2011 launched one of his books.

Thomas Keneally.

In 2006 Keneally was a member of the Advertising Standards Board that approved an obscene “Lolita-style” jeans advertisement for public dissemination, including large billboards. The photographer was Terry Richardson, who has a long history of producing obscenity, and has been accused of sexual assault by multiple women.

Herald Sun columnist Andrew Bolt called the board members “barbarians” and said the approval was “a gift to pedophiles”.

More disturbing though are the activities of the man Turnbull describes as one of his mentors,2 the radical homosexual Australian High Court Justice Michael Kirby.

Former High Court Justice, Michael Kirby.

In 2000, whilst still a High Court Justice, Kirby joined the ‘Board of Governors’ of the Kinsey Institute, a so-called “sex research” organisation in the United States that has been accused of co-operating with paedophiles and child sexual abusers for “research” on child sexuality.

The institute was founded in 1947 by American ‘sex researcher’ Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956) with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation and support from Indiana University. Its original name was simply the “Institute for Sex Research” (ISR), but it was renamed in 1981 to honour its founder.

Kinsey is widely considered to be one of the primary initiators of the ‘sexual revolution’ (i.e. the normalisation of sexual immorality), which largely came to fruition in the 1960s and 70s, and continues unabated.

The work of Prof. James H. Jones, a Pulitzer Prize nominated author, and Dr. Judith Reisman, a meticulous American researcher, has exposed Alfred Kinsey as a sado-masochistic homosexual who was involved in pseudo-scientific sexual experiments on children.3 It is also said that Kinsey:

  • Had an “open marriage” with his wife Clara, so he could indulge in homosexual activities.4
  • Had sexual relationships with his male students and colleagues at Indiana University.
  • Had a fetish for tying rope around his scrotum and sticking objects in his urethra, for example: toothbrushes, drinking straws and pipe cleaners. He would then tug on the rope.5
  • Was addicted to masturbation, impotent and had serious orchitis.5
  • Was a misogynist who viewed women as “parasites”.6
  • Circumcised himself, without anaesthesia, using a pocket knife.7

Turnbull’s mentor, Michael Kirby, has openly praised Dr. Alfred Kinsey, and says he was “honoured” to serve on the board of the “sex research” institute he founded. We should also note that Kirby has previously been accused of picking up underage male prostitutes by Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan, but Heffernan couldn’t produce enough evidence and was ordered to apologise.

Dr. Reisman has written six books on the subject of the sexual revolution, two of which specifically focus on Kinsey. If you want further information, I highly recommend these books. There are also four documentaries on the disturbing activities of Kinsey and his associates:

Dr. Alfred Kinsey.  Alfred_Kinsey

8. Support for Islam

Malcolm Turnbull is infamous for his contributions on Islam. He says Islam is an “ancient religion of great scholarship” and that we should embrace Muslim immigration. This is perhaps unsurprising when you consider some of the issues on which Islam is in agreement with leftist-‘progressives’.

Islam, of course, permits sexual activity between adults and prepubescent children. Indeed the Islamic “prophet” himself, whose life is considered the gold standard for piety, had vaginal intercourse with one of his “wives” when she was only 9 years of age.9

In Islam, it is possible for an adult man to “marry” a female from her birth, and certain sexual activities are allowed from birth, although vaginal penetration is usually delayed until at least 9 years of age.

In an Islamic treatise titled Tahrir al Wasilah [volume 2, pg. 343], the former Supreme Leader of Iran, Grand Ayatollah Khomeini, states that:

“It is not permissible to have sexual intercourse (with one’s wife) before she reaches 9 years in age, be it in Nikaah (permanent marriage) or Mut’a (temporary marriage). As for all other pleasures such as lustful touch, embracing, and thighing (i.e. rubbing penis between the thighs), there is no problem in it, even if she is a suckling baby. If he does have sexual intercourse before nine years of age and does not penetrate, there is no penalty, but he has committed a sin. If he does penetrate causing the vagina and urethra openings to be one, she will become forever haram for him…”

The late Grand Ayatollah Khomeini.  Ayatollah Khomeini

This view is shared by other prominent Islamic scholars, including Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani, who, in Minhaaj al-Saaliheen [volume 3, pg. 10] makes a near identical statement:

“It is not permissible to have sexual intercourse (with one’s wife) before she reaches 9 years in age, be it in Nikaah (permanent marriage) or Mut’a (temporary marriage). As for all other pleasures such as lustful touch, kissing, embracing, and thighing, there is no problem in it…”

Ayatollahs al-Sistani (left) and al-Khoi.  Ayatollah_al-Khoi_and_Ali_al-Sistani

This contrasts starkly with Christianity, where prepubescent marriage and sexual activity of any kind were always dogmatically forbidden. This is because the fundamental purpose of Christian marriage is the procreation and nurturing of children, rather than male sexual gratification, as in Islam.


Back to Homepage

References:

1. Turnbull, M. (1988). The Spycatcher Trial. (pp. 120-121). London: Heinemann.

2. Ibid, p. 89.

3. Reisman, J. (2012). Kinsey: Crime and Consequences (4th ed.). (pp. 132-180). United States: Institute for Media Education.

4. Ibid, p. 12.

5. Ibid, pp. 285-286.

6. Ibid, pp. 26, 107, 282.

7. Jones, J.H. (1997). Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life. (pp. 604-607). New York: W. W. Norton.

8. Turnbull, M. (1975, Dec 24). Uncle Tom turns off the raw porn. Nation Review, p. 273.

9. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234.

#

Paedophile-protectors Bravehearts & Bond University team up for dodgy research

Bravehearts & Bond
Bond Uni Professor Paul Wilson published pro-paedophile material on Bond University’s website.Wilson is currently in court defending multiple paedophilia charges. He has countless more to come…

Paul Wilson’s wife Robyn Lincoln, another Bond Uni lecturer, was on Braveheart’s Advisory Board until Wilson was charged.

Robyn Lincoln was replaced by Terry Goldsworthy who now sits on Braveheart’s Advisory Board.

Terry Goldsworthy also replaced Paul Wilson as Bond Uni’s head of Criminology, after Wilson was charged.

Fiona Barnett was targeted by Bond University after she adhered to mandatory reporting laws in the Bond Uni clinic. Fiona reported fresh allegations of child abuse by a Miami (Gold Coast) DOCS foster parent against a 10 yo child.

La Trobe University academic defends paedophilia

Children can experience “a sense of power and control in sexual encounters with adults” and sexual pleasure, according to a senior La Trobe University academic who supports the controversial Safe Schools Coalition Australia program

Dr Steven Angelides is the Senior Grants Administrator of La Trobe’s Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS), which launched the “Safe Schools” program.  He has argued that children are capable of consenting to sexual activity with adults, and that such activities are not necessarily harmful.

The PaedoFile: Are paedophilephiles simply daft, or is there something else going on?

reecepaedo

In today’s Daily Telegraph, there is a report (which I have checked out fully) about how Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, called on Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to relax rules automatically banning sex offenders from caring for children. The usual bollocks is applied, viz: such a ban “could breach their human rights”.

In an article in the somehow ‘respected’ Child and Family Law Quarterly, Miss Reece suggested that reoffending rates were not high among sex criminals, adding: “despite growing public concern over paedophilia, the numbers of child sex murders are very low.”

 Ah, right: children abused, not many dead. OK, that is unpleasantly insouciant….but the ‘low reoffending rates’ assertion is simply a lie. Why tell a lie?

 Last November, Jon Brown of the NSPCC said: “Reoffending rates for sex offenders have risen in recent years, but until now we did not know how many of these involved the sexual abuse of children. From now on, we want a separate tab kept on the number of child sex offenders in this country and how many go on to abuse again …. Any offender with a history of child sex abuse should be considered a risk to children’s safety for the rest of their lives. This is why it is so important they are closely tracked and monitored by the police once they are back in the community.”

 Miss Reece, by contrast, suggests that the law should be reviewed to introduce an assumption that child abusers pose no threat once they’ve served their sentence. Unbelievable: every last iota of field evidence suggests the diametric opposite. But Reece concludes, “There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them.”

 This simply isn’t true. In 2007, child sex-abuse researcher Adrian Powell wrote as follows in his book Paedophiles, child abuse and the Internet:

 ‘The rate of reoffending is of major concern, as it is estimated that a paedophile offender is 90% likely to reoffend…once a paedophile chooses to offend against a victim, the desire becomes compulsive.’

Sex offenders including paedophiles should be allowed to adopt, Theresa May told

Rules which bar sex offenders from working with children are ‘unfair’ and even convicted paedophiles should have the right to adopt, a leading legal academic has said.

 

 

Theresa May was urged to allow sex offenders to adopt Photo: AFP

 

 

 

Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, called on Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to relax rules which automatically ban sex offenders from caring for children, saying that this could breach their human rights.

In an article in the respected Child and Family Law Quarterly, Miss Reece suggested that reoffending rates were not high among sex criminals, adding: “despite growing public concern over paedophilia, the numbers of child sex murders are very low.”

A review is currently ongoing into the Vetting and Barring Scheme, introduced following the 2002 Soham murders, amid concerns by ministers that it is too heavy handed.

As well as banning certain offenders, the law currently requires adults coming into regular contact with children other than their own to be screened.

Mrs May ordered the review amid concerns about the vetting of ordinary volunteers such as parents who drive children to football practice and church flower arrangers.

 

In her article, Miss Reece suggested that the review should also introduce an assumption that sex offenders including child abusers posed no threat once they had served their sentence.

She said: "There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them.

“The Vetting and Barring Scheme and other legislative measures single out sex offenders for unfair special treatment and they destroy the principle that a prisoner pays his or her debt by serving their sentence before re-entering society on equal terms.”

Individuals are placed on the “Barred List” and banned from working with youngsters or vulnerable adults if they are convicted of a sexual or violent offence, or one involving the mistreatment of a child.

Miss Reece criticised the rules for leading all sex offenders to be “tarred with the same brush,” saying that while “careful screening” was “important,” the issuing of a “blanket ban” violated the rights of criminals who wanted to adopt or work with young people.

She highlighted the case of a grandfather with a conviction for having sex with a 15-year-old dating back to when he was 29, who was refused permission to adopt his own grandchildren.

The ban could contravene the principle of non-discrimination enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, and may leave the Government open to legal challenge, Miss Reece warned.

Comparing sex offenders to cohabiting couples, she suggested that if blanket bans on the former were allowed, it would make sense to bar those who were not married from adopting because parents who were wed were less likely to separate with harmful consequences for the child.

She also highlighted the case of four nurses who recently won a High Court challenge after being barred for having convictions. One of the nurses was banned over a police caution for leaving her own children alone in their home.

“Rather than presuming that everyone is a potential risk to children and must therefore be vetted, any vetting or barring should be based on very strong evidence that they are a risk,” the academic said.

“This would represent a victory not only for human rights but for protecting the best interests of children.”

Miss Reece has been at the LSE since September 2009, having previously worked at the University of London, University College London and Birkbeck College.

A trained barrister, she has an MSc in logic and scientific method, and was awarded the Socio-Legal Studies Association Book Prize in 2004 for a monograph called “Divorcing Responsibly.

She has also argued that rape victims should no longer be granted anonymity.

A Home Office spokesman said: “It is safe to say that the vetting review will not be considering allowing paedophiles to adopt. It wouldn’t exactly go down well with the public.

“The review is very much focused on seeing whether the rules have gone too far in stopping normal volunteering with children, while continuing to carry out criminal records checks on people in sensitive posts, such as in the NHS.”

Related Articles

Anti-paedophile vetting scheme to be ripped up -22 Oct 2010

 

Annabel's blooming furious with CRB checks - 07 Dec 2010

 

Vetting and barring scheme ‘a waste of money’ - 11 Apr 2010

 

Carr remanded in custody - 27 Sep 2002

 

Parents who ferry children face abuser checks - 11 Sep 200

 

Judge weakens paedophiles rules - 20 Aug 2011