fbpx

Under the guise of humanitarian aid, high-profile paedophiles are abusing Nepali children

Type of protection : Granting release
Loose laws, illiteracy and poverty, along with an unsuspicious welcome of foreigners, have turned Nepal into a haven for Western paedophiles. Post Illustration:Rabindra Manandhar

On the afternoon of July 8, there was a commotion outside the usually quiet white brick-and-cement Kavre District Court..


https://tkpo.st/32TNdU5

[Another] Judge (Ryan) sympathises with Children's Court guard who had sex with 'worldly' 14-year-old

Abusers job or title:: Children’s Court Security Guard
Judges name: Christopher Ryan
Judges title: Judge
Judges position: Judge
Paedophile protected: Franco Abad
Paedophile protectors court location: Melbourne Children’s Court
Type of protection : Granting release

A County Court judge who released a former Children's Court security guard on a good behaviour bond after he had sex with a 14-year-old has been criticised for his remarks about sex.

Child abuse survivor advocates have denounced Judge Christopher Ryan's comments from the bench as unacceptable and ill-informed.

Abuser Name or Alias:: Franco Abad, 30
Abusers Organisation:: Melbourne Children’s Court
Matter Resolved?: Yes

Police protect paedophile within their ranks

Type of protection : Granting release

A former Victorian police officer has been convicted of raping children during his time on the force.

The former officer, whose name has been suppressed to protect the identity of his victims, has pleaded guilty to 18 offences against nine children, including his own stepchildren, which were committed between 1967 and 1979.

Police protect paedophile within their ranks

Type of protection : Granting release

Police station

The former officer, whose name has been suppressed to protect the identity of his victims, has pleaded guilty to 18 offences against nine children, including his own stepchildren, which were committed between 1967 and 1979.

The Blue Shield

AFP officer and brother face further charges on possessing child exploitation material

Abusers job or title:: Federal Police Officer
Type of protection : Granting release
Australian Federal PoliceAFP officer charged with child exploitation offences.

An Australian Federal Police officer and his twin brother charged with child exploitation offences have had new charges laid against them.

AFP officer Joshua Rod Tiffen and Kenan Lee Tiffen, 41, sought a variation of their bail conditions in the ACT Magistrates Court on Tuesday.

Josh Tiffen has been charged with seven counts of distributing intimate images without consent, two counts of intimate observations or capturing visual data and one count of possessing child exploitation material.

Abuser Name or Alias:: AFP officer Joshua Rod Tiffen (41) and Kenan Lee Tiffen, 41
Abusers Organisation:: Australian Federal Police

Australian Federal Police officer facing multiple child sexual offences will fight charges

Abusers job or title:: AFP Officer
Judges name: Magistrate Louise Taylor
Judges title: Magistrate
Paedophile protected: 35yo AFP Officer from Palmerston ACT
Paedophile protectors court location: ACT Magistrates Court
Type of protection : Granting release
Badge on the sleeve of Australian Federal Police officer's uniform.The AFP officer was suspended from duty in June.(ABC News)

An Australian Federal Police officer accused of having a sexual relationship with a child will fight multiple criminal charges against him.

The 35-year-old man, who was suspended from duty last month, did not appear in the ACT Magistrates Court today.

Abuser Name or Alias:: 35 year old AFP Officer from Palmerston, ACT
Abusers Organisation:: Australian Federal Police
Matter Resolved?: Ongoing

AFP officer charged with child exploitation offence

Abusers job or title:: Queensland AFP Officer
Type of protection : Granting release
AFP badgeA 45-year-old AFP officer from Queensland has been charged with allegedly accessing child exploitation material following an internal investigation by AFP Professional Standards.

The male officer has been suspended from duty and is expected to appear in Brisbane Magistrates Court today (8 September) following a search warrant at a residence in Geebung yesterday.

The officer was formally charged by AFP Professional Standards with accessing child exploitation material contrary to section 474 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth).

Abuser Name or Alias:: A 45-year-old AFP officer from Queensland
Abusers Organisation:: Australian Federal Police
Matter Resolved?: Ongoing

Police officer accused of using hidden cameras in home, possessing child abuse images

Abusers job or title:: Canberra AFP Officer
Type of protection : Granting release
Two unidentified people wearing jackets with "Australian Federal Police" and "Forensics" on the back.One of the men arrested is a serving member of the AFP.(Supplied: Australian Federal Police)

A Canberra Australian Federal Police (AFP) officer and his twin brother are behind bars after police allegedly found a large quantity of child pornography, hidden cameras and a device transmitting offensive material at their home.

Abuser Name or Alias:: Joshua Tiffen
Abusers Organisation:: Australian Federal Police
Matter Resolved?: Ongoing

Perth cop to face court over child porn

Abusers job or title:: Police Constable
Type of protection : Granting release

A PERTH police constable will face court after child porn was allegedly found at his home during a police raid.

The 29-year-old from Currambine is due to appear in the Perth Magistrates Court today charged with child exploitation offences.

Australian Federal Police said Canada’s National Child Exploitation Coordination Centre alerted police to alleged child exploitation offences.

Abuser Name or Alias:: Perth Police Constable : 29-year-old from Currambine
Abusers Organisation:: WA Police
Matter Resolved?: Ongoing

Paedophile Police and Hypocrisy in R v Edwards [2019] QCA 15

Type of protection : Granting release

  Notable Unreported Decision

{solid} Appeal Determined (QCA) 

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

R v Edwards [2019] QCA 15

PARTIES:

R
v
EDWARDS, Gregory Paul
(applicant)

FILE NO/S:

CA No 269 of 2018

DC No 1920 of 2018

DIVISION:

Court of Appeal

PROCEEDING:

Sentence Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court at Brisbane – Date of Sentence: 19 October 2018 (Smith DCJ)

DELIVERED ON:

12 February 2019

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

6 November 2018

JUDGES:

Morrison and Philippides JJA and Boddice J

ORDER:

The application is refused.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – GROUNDS FOR INTERFERENCE – SENTENCE MANIFESTLY EXCESSIVE – where the applicant pleaded guilty to the offence of using a carriage service to access child pornography material – where he was sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment, to be released on a $500 recognizance after serving two months, on the condition that he be subject to probation for a period of two years – where defence counsel contended that the imposition of a period of actual custody is manifestly excessive – where the applicant was a serving federal police officer – where the majority of the child pornography material were graphic representations in the form of computer generated figures engaged in sexual activity or stories – where it was submitted the nature of the offending did not attract a period of actual custody – whether the sentence was manifestly excessive

Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 17A

Criminal Code (Cth), s 474.19(1)

Assheton v The Queen (2002) 132 A Crim R 237; [2002] WASCA 209, cited

Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v D’Alessandro(2010) 26 VR 477; [2010] VSCA 60, cited

Godfrey v The Queen[2013] WASCA 247, cited

McEwen v Simmons(2008) 73 NSWLR 10; [2008] NSWSC 1292, cited

R v Gordon; Ex parte Commonwealth DPP[2011] 1 Qd R 429 ;[2009] QCA 209, distinguished

R v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550; [2015] HCA 39, cited

R v Porte (2015) 252 A Crim R 294; [2015] NSWCCA 174, cited

R v Reid [2004] QCA 9, applied

COUNSEL:

D A Holliday, with L M Dollar, for the applicant (pro bono)

B Power for the respondent

SOLICITORS:

Robertson O’Gorman for the applicant

Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) for the respondent

  1. [1]
    MORRISON JA: On 19 October 2018 the applicant pleaded guilty to the offence of using a carriage service to access child pornography material contrary to s 474.19(1) of the Criminal Code (Cth). He was sentenced that day to 15 months’ imprisonment, to be released on a $500 recognizance after serving two months, on the condition that he be subject to probation for a period of two years.

Abuse survivor speaks out: “Cops stood guard as I was raped by politicians as a child”

Editors notes: Baker explained how she and other children around the age of 6 were often brought to various properties and given alcohol and then raped by judges and lords. Jessa Dillow-Crisp recently testified at the Colorado State Capitol, during Human Trafficking Awareness and Advocacy Day, about the horrible experiences that she had in her past. She was unable to report the abuse or go to the police because there were a number of police officers who were involved in her kidnapping and abuse. “There was gang raping, the police officer who handcuffed me and raped me, told me I would be put in jail if I opened my voice,” she said.
Judges name: Various Judges and Lords
Paedophile protected: Judges and Lords and Police
Paedophile protectors court location: Staffordshire, England.
Type of protection : Granting release

Staffordshire, Eng — An abuse survivor has bravely broken her silence to tell her horrific childhood story. In an interview with Sky News, Esther Baker, 32, explained how she and other children were raped by politicians as uniformed police officers stood guard.

“I got the feeling very much that they were protecting somebody, that they were with one of the men,” said Baker.

“One of them (police officers) I knew from church. There were a few occasions where they would be in uniform, and I kind of knew, I learnt that when they were in uniform that it was going to be a rough night,”

Abuser Name or Alias:: UK Politicians guarded by UK Police
Abusers Organisation:: UK Government
Matter Resolved?: No

CA Democrats author bill to protect sex offenders who lure minors

Type of protection : Granting release

No sex offender registry if perpetrator within 10 years of age of the minorSenator Wiener with fellow LGBT Legislative Caucus members Susan Eggman, Todd Gloria, Toni Atkins, Ricardo Lara, Cathleen Galgiani, Evan Low, and Sabrina Cervantes. (Sen. Wiener photo gallery)

By , February 19, 2019 3:03 pm

State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.”

However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor.

State Senator Scott Wiener. (Kevin Sanders For California Globe)

Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.”

Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California.

Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.”

“This bill would authorize a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors to seek discretionary relief from the duty to register if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor,” SB 145 states.

Proposition 35 was created and passed to protect children from sexual exploitation and sex trafficking. Victims of sex trafficking are often vulnerable children, “afraid for their lives and abused—sexually, physically, and mentally,” the Proposition said.

What Does SB 145 Also Do?

Legislators Wiener and Eggman say they are trying to shield LGBT young people from having to automatically register as sex offenders for specified sex crimes. But their bill does much more.

Assemblywoman Susan Eggman

SB 145 would allow a sex offender who lures a minor with the intent to commit a felony (i.e. a sex act) the ability to escape registering as a sex offender as long as the offender is within 10 years of age of the minor.  No specification is made as to whether the sexual offender is straight or LGBT.

SB 145 would add a section to the state’s penal code (Section 290.55) stipulating that as long as the offender is “not more than 10 years older than the minor,” they are not automatically mandated to register as a sex offender. There is no age limit or range specified, except for existing law which already excludes lewd acts with children under 14.

SB 145 appears to allow adults to victimize minors by luring them with the intent to have sex, and then shields the predator from being automatically registered as a sex offender, as in the case of a 25 year old luring a 15 year old for sex, or a 22 year old luring a 12 year old.

SB 145, as currently written, appears to allow certain sexual predators to live among the population without anyone being aware.

Why is this bill needed?

Here is the text from SB 145:

This bill would authorize a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors to seek discretionary relief from the duty to register if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor.

Digest Key – Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Section 290.55 is added to the Penal Code, immediately following Section 290.5, to read:

290.55. (a) A person convicted of an offense specified in subdivision (b) may, by writ of mandate, seek discretionary relief from the duty, imposed as a result of that conviction, to register pursuant to the act if, at the time of the offense, the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor, as measured from the minor’s date of birth to the person’s date of birth.

Here is the current California Penal Code § 288.3 (2017)

(a) Every person who contacts or communicates with a minor, or attempts to contact or communicate with a minor, who knows or reasonably should know that the person is a minor, with intent to commit an offense specified in Section 207, 209, 261, 264.1, 273a, 286, 287, 288, 288.2, 289, 311.1, 311.2, 311.4 or 311.11, or former Section 288a, involving the minor shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for the term prescribed for an attempt to commit the intended offense.

(b) As used in this section, “contacts or communicates with” shall include direct and indirect contact or communication that may be achieved personally or by use of an agent or agency, any print medium, any postal service, a common carrier or communication common carrier, any electronic communications system, or any telecommunications, wire, computer, or radio communications device or system.

(c) A person convicted of a violation of subdivision (a) who has previously been convicted of a violation of subdivision (a) shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for five years.

Last week, California Globe reported on another sex crime bill introduced by California Democrats: “legislation to shield a person from the consequences of crimes they commit in California, even violent ones, as long as the person reports the crimes to authorities.The language of the proposed statute appears to immunize a person from ANY crime so long as they are reporting a violation of a sex crime law.”  Sen. Scott Wiener is the author of California Senate Bill 233.

Source : https://californiaglobe.com/legislature/ca-democrats-author-bill-to-protect-sex-offenders-who-lure-minors/?unapproved=8113&moderation-hash=79a5d8207fe6f5a173520d021b8a8390#comment-8113

Subcategories