fbpx

The Childrens Courts are Non-Adversarial

bullshitIf any of you are wondering why you are getting completely f**ked up the a**e by the Childrens Courts even after you gain an Appeal in the District Court ... here is the reason why!

Some piece of shit made the District Courts not follow the Rules of Evidence when it is related to the Childrens Court!

You know what this means dont you? 

Even after those scumbag DoCS Workers lie their arses off and steal your children on their bullshit lies and are not able to be cross-examined on them in Childrens Court, (because DoCS Workers only tell the truth) and thats why what they say is THE TRUTH - the Rules of Evidence DO NOT APPLY IN DISTRICT COURT.

So basically you have to wait all those years to get your matter heard in Supreme Court to be able to get any justice, or your children back, if they're not dead already, because nothing that a DoCS Worker says has to be proven until Supreme Court.

Alecomm is demanding immediate action in that ANY DISTRICT COURT MATTER MUST ABIDE BY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE - and we are now petitioning to have all matters in the Childrens Courts to have to abide by Rules of Evidence also.

This is to ensure that NO MORE CHILDREN ARE STOLEN BY DIRTY LYING DOCS WORKERS!  And that before ANY CHILD IS REMOVED, there must BE EVIDENCE OF ABUSE, not just a DoCS Workers word, because they're words mean absolutely JACK SHIT!

Oh, for those of you wondering about the Rules of Evidence and why they do not apply in Childrens Court or District Court - the answer is to keep it NON-ADVERSARIAL.

Im sorry but I think the government needs to realise that when they have taken our children from our care - IT IS VERY ADVERSARIAL.!!!  And we would like to see such appropriate evidence of abuse before our children are taken and made into their personal little cash cows, as we all know how much money each child taken into  "care" generates.

Suggested Reading :(NSW Children's Court President) Mark Mariens Paper or View the Corrupt Legislation Here - Section 93 - Childrens Court Procedure - General Nature of Proceedings.

Comments

+1 #1 RE: The Childrens Courts are Non-AdversarialGuest 2011-12-13 05:49
We have tried to use the Administrative Law, and issued Letter of Demand to cause explaination of action. When ignored by the almighty DOCS, they were brought before the Supreme Court. So scared were DOCS(govn), the judges ignored the Law and upheld the Children's Court ruling. They did this twice. Until we can get judge accountability in the High Court, the corruption is just going to continue!

You must be logged in to comment due to spam issues.