Back when cases involving missing children – many of them runaways from foster care – were making headlines in Washington, D.C., Marie Cohen rushed to try to shift responsibility from a failing foster care system. She told us to be sure to remember that a majority of missing children in the District of Columbia “are fleeing their own homes, not foster care.”
That’s a testament not to the success of foster care but rather to the immutable laws of mathematics. Despite the best efforts of those pushing endlessly for a take-the-child-and-run approach to child welfare, a majority of children still live in their own homes, so those will be the homes from which a majority of runaways run.
What developments have there been in Operation NoEthics?
- Details
-
Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
-
Created: Monday, 08 July 2019 21:18
-
Written by Alecomm2
Well apart from the Australian Federal Police lying and perjuring themselves in two separate court cases in the past fortnight, doctoring the transcript of a witness interview and removing detrimental statements about certain AFP officers being named as child sex abusers, probably not too much.
Patrick O’Dea, the good doctor Russell Pridgeon and others still have ankle jewellery, and aren’t allowed interstate to attend child protection conferences with other decent human beings.
There’s also huge accolades to the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions for delivering it’s biggest brief in history - around ten thousand pages of absolute rubbish that has absolutely nothing to do with the case and is merely designed to keep the judge confused with his eyes not on the ball.
Oh, they also sent our staff intimidatory letters claiming they could be a potential witness - even though all the evidence the staff members had, the AFP already have four copies of.
AND last but not least they got Border Patrol to detain out lovely Mishka Hudson at Tullamarine airport upon return from her holiday. They held her over two hours, copied her phone AGAIN, using terrorism legislation - all without a warrant.
That about covers it for now.
Top disability services provider Lifestyle Solutions investigated over series of deaths
- Details
-
Category: Children in residential care facilities Australia
-
Created: Monday, 27 March 2017 20:39
-
Written by Linton Besser, Klaus Toft, Jeanavive McGregor and Alison Brandon - Four Corners
One of Australia's most high-profile providers of disability services, Lifestyle Solutions, is under review by both the Victorian Government and the NSW Ombudsman after a series of deaths of its clients and other alarming reports about the abuse and neglect of some disabled people in its care.
Key points:
Failings were identified after four patient deaths
In one incident, a woman who had her legs amputated was left alone overnight and had no way to seek help
Victorian Government cancelled contract with Lifestyle Solutions after complaints
Not all Heroes wear Capes - Exposing Operation NoEthics
- Details
-
Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
-
Created: Friday, 13 September 2019 19:43
-
Written by What Paedophile Conspiracy
There's something "strange" going on in the hidden circles within circles that have developed and become entrenched in certain echelons of society in Australia. Injustice, cruelty, corruption and extortion seem to thrive in certain mixes while feeding on the incompetence and greed that other schools of thought and obsessions with tradition have bred.
I recently posted in a group for ex Rhodesians the following:
(excerpt):
"Any of you following the progress of proceedings against two fellow ex Rhodies, one a respected GP/doctor, the other a vet of the bush war and decorated for his service, who are facing 30 years if convicted of all charges, and who have been SLANDERED by the feds, labeled as "child stealers" by main stream media across the country (Aus), all because they were the only two with backbone enough to defy and breach the dangerous and inappropriate orders made in relation to the custody of twin sisters that saw these little girls suffer immeasurably, while the 13 adults (mother, grandparents, teachers, psychologists, professors, child abuse specialists and advocates, experts in the field) who they continued to disclose to were, other than one, never even interviewed, instead reprimanded and threatened with jail if they continued to report the disclosures and repeatedly witnessed physical injuries to the relevant authorities?
Not all heroes wear capes.
The AFP used terrorist legislation to detain and intimidate human rights activists
- Details
-
Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
-
Created: Sunday, 07 July 2019 17:56
-
Written by Alecomm2
This week the Australian Federal Police used Terrorist Legislation to detain and intimidate Australian human rights advocate, Mishka Hudson. Mishka is a potential witness for the AFP’s Operation NoEthics, a state and federal, police and judiciary coverup of children being sent to live with sex offending parents via the family court.
There is no shortage of caselaw granting custody to paedophiles in family court because the mother or child dared disclose the sexual abuse, but the outting of the system has caused a ripple effect of attacks on those daring to expose the patriarchy in family courts today.
The AFP are using every possible opportunity to intimidate witnesses including myself in an effort to silence the truth.
Taxpayers should know that the AFP involved in this matter point blank refused to investigate the mountain of evidence supporting the children’s disclosures of sexual abuse and remain adamant they will charge and jail anyone who stands up against child sexual abuse by proxy of the federal courts.
Child sex abuse cases in the Family Court of Australia
- Details
-
Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
-
Created: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 21:45
-
Written by An extract taken from the book "Child Protection" written by Professor Freda Briggs. AO
For her PhD, Dr Wendy Foote (2006) researched into what happens when mothers report child sexual abuse to Family Courts. She found that normal maternal anxiety is pathologised and mothers, not fathers, are labelled as mentally ill. Ironically, mothers who are mentally ill do not automatically lose residence of their chidren outside the Family Court.
In only 6% of litigated cases, accused fathers were banned from spending time with their children. In 38% of these cases, the ban related to child abuse/family violence and only 2% of these fathers were labelled as mentally ill. The notion that mothers concoct allegations of child sexual abuse has persisted despite (a) Australian and International research showing that children`s evidence is reliable and (b) research conducted with the cooperation of the Australian Family Court showed that false allegations are rare and, when they occur, the mothers usually had good reason to suspect that their children were being abused or were at high risk.