Main Menu

Validate Your Visit


Dont forget to view the complaints registers and enter your own anonymous complaints about DoCS Workers / Lawyers / Court Experts

Available Downloads by Category

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday17447
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday23316
mod_vvisit_counterThis week40763
mod_vvisit_counterLast week134038
mod_vvisit_counterThis month305656
mod_vvisit_counterLast month622837
mod_vvisit_counterAll days4191435

We have: 407 guests online
Your IP: : 54.87.76.100
 , 
Today: April 28, 2015



Designed by:

Mother locks daughters in bedroom so pedophile partner can stay over
Written by Yahoo7 News   
Monday, 20 April 2015 16:49

A convicted pedophile is reportedly allowed to live in the same house as two young girls so long as their mother locks them in their bedroom at night.

The girls grandmother claims social services approved the plan before the girl's step-dad moved in, despite knowledge of his history.

She says the girls, both under the age of 13, are given a baby monitor so they can let their mother know if they need to

go to the bathroom.

“The alarm and the other so-called precautions stop my granddaughters being abused are a load of rubbish,” she told the Sunday Mirror.

 
Publicity is the very soul of justice

Image result for justice and publicity quotesPublicity is the very soul of justice. It is the keenest spur to exertion, and the surest of all guards against improbity. It keeps the judge himself, while trying, under trial.

In the darkness of secrecy, sinister interest and evil in every shape, have full swing. Only in proportion as publicity has place can any of the checks, applicable to judicial injustice, operate. Where there is no publicity there is no justice.

Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1832)

 
Out of Home Care Inquiry Speech

Below is the speech delivered to the Senate Committee for the Inquiry to Out of Home Care in Brisbane on 17 April 2015.

Good morning senate committee,

I would like to take the opportunity to thank you all for allowing Alecomm to participate in this public hearing. It is with honour we present you our submission, and thank you for taking the time to read it and present us with more questions so we can all work to improve the outcomes for children in out of home care.

The Australian Legislative Ethics Commission is a recognised Australian charity. Our motto is working for the betterment of both government and community. The majority of our resources are currently spent in the child protection industry, auditing casefiles for compliance, advocating for parents, providing some limited legal expertise and personal support to those affected by the system, and working strategically in various areas to enable positive change, so that children and their families can have better outcomes.

For the record we receive no funding, so are not dictated as to how we may react or respond by any parties and can show a complete bi-partisan understanding of the out of home care system in Australia.

With us, families know they are not alone and they are not being singled out to have their children removed because of who they are – it is because of what the system is and has been allowed to become.

We give our clients strength and knowledge, compassion and understanding, and we are there to ensure that they do not take their own life whilst they are fighting for that of their children’s.

 
2 year old toddler killed in care of DoCS NSW
Sunday, 14 September 2014 22:36

blood splatterAnother toddler has drowned in foster care after being removed from his mother just three weeks earlier.  Many mainstream news outlets have publicised the death, but there has not been one mention that the child, Braxton, was prematurely taken from his mother, prior to supports being provided as per usual, and placed in the care of more lousy and careless foster carers who only care for the money the child will bring them, and not the child himself.

Time and time again children die in the so-called "care" of the department, without anybody being held accountable.

Braxton was only two years old and his life was taken by the agency that purports to be there to protect children.  It is time charges are laid for carers who kill children in their care.

 
DoCS Wollongong successfully win court orders to place children with a convicted paedophile.

paedophile 08665It is rumoured, that today DoCS put three kids with their convicted paedophile father at Wollongong.  DoCS said "we know he [Raymond] is a convicted paedophile.  But he has changed.  He has been to jail for the conviction".

He has groomed the same children, his own children, for paedophile purposes.  DoCS have taken the three children from their grandparents, to put them with their paedophile father.

DoCS have refused to give counselling and support to their grandparents.

It does make you wonder though, doesn't it.  Paedophiles get access and custody of innocent children - thanks to retarded DoCS workers, murderers of babies get contact with their other children, yet innocent parents who control-freak DoCS workers don't like have their children hidden from them until they're eighteen years old.

Is there a decision ever made by this department that IS in the best interest of ANY child!

 
Sydney Magistrate Terrence Murphy blames mother for child being sexually assaulted in care

evil judge sml 4070cSydney Magistrate Terrence Murphy has recently handed down a decision in the Supreme Court of NSW, where he has dispicabbly blamed a mother for her daughter being sexually assaulted.  He has used this as an excuse to side with the Department of Community Services Campbelltown Office in stating that the newborn baby of this mother belongs in care - because the mother failed to protect her other child.

It is routinely common these days for DoCS caseworkers to blame mothers for being victims of domestic violence and use this as the reason for removing their children.  Little do they know that some of these children are turning suicidal because they have been taken away from the only family that they have ever known, and the mother who has loved and protected them their whole lives.

To now see Supreme Court Magistrates siding with DoCS Officers and blatantly violating both the mother and childs international human rights is disgusting.  International law states that both mother and child are entitled to special protection by the state - this means victims of domestic violence too.

It is bad enough when low-life registrars in the Children's Courts are doing this, but when magistrates in the upper courts are following suit and violating the rights of those they are bound to protect by law, it is nothing less than despicable.

Take away their judicial immunity and watch how quick they fall into line when they know they can get charged for doing the wrong thing.  Shame on you Magistrate Murphy - sentencing a newborn baby to a life of misery because the older child was assaulted.  Denying the child its mothers cuddles, and love and breastmilk.  And now sending the child interstate because it is more financially viable.

Magistrate Murphy needs to be made an example of.  This rubbish where you can only complain about a magistrate and there are no consequences for them.  What a croc!  

 
Baby boy dies after being hit by government (DoCS / FACS) car in driveway of Ipswich home
Written by Brittany Vonow, Ruth McCosker. Rhian Deutrom - The Courier-Mail   
Tuesday, 13 January 2015 00:00

Braxton Nowlan who was run over at his grandmothers driveway in Clarke St, Ripley.

UPDATE: A Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services spokesman has this afternoon confirmed that a department car was involved in an incident yesterday afternoon in which a young boy died..

“The department is providing the utmost care and support to both family members and staff,” he said.

“The department will review this incident and this review will also be externally scrutinized. The police are continuing their investigation and will also prepare a report for the coroner’s office.”

The Department of Child Safety said due to ongoing investigations it did not intend on commenting further.

Earlier:15 month-old boy killed yesterday when he was hit by a car reversing down the driveway of his Ipswich home has been remembered as a “happy-go-lucky” child with a “smile that could lighten up a sad face”.

Braxton James Nowlan, who would have turned two in August, was hit and killed on the driveway outside his Ripley home by a government car in the tragic accident.

 
Corruption in the High Court of Australia

trickortreason c6201Almost a year on and nothing has been done, or indeed reported, in any mainstream media in Australia ... Not all governments are corrupt but all governments have been corrupt ... and surprise surprise it is no different in Australia ...

What's abhorrent in the matter is that the Australian government passes judgement on other governments of the world, while claiming the high moral ground ... what a load of bolloks!!

Today Systemic Judicial corruption is International Organized Crime

  1. We have a judicial system that suppress and intimidates the public,
  2. we have judicial members that are working to promote international treaties that attack the constitution,
  3. we have lawyers and law firms promoting other lawyers into our legislation, in violation of the separation of power,
  4. we have lawyers making laws that violate the conflict of interest rules and laws , they or family members have economic gain, and
  5. we have systemic abuse of the public interest with lawyers and judges neglecting their responsibilty to enforce misconduct rules and prosecute lawyers and judges for crimes.

How many Children, parents and grandparents will they continue to kill and abuse? Unite to hold them accountable! Systemic abuse is against the law!

 
The Stop Stealing our Children Speech at G20 Summit Brisbane

cooltext1796226747b 822c3Australia is the government child stealing capital of the world. Australian government child protection departments' have stolen more children per head of population than any other western nation. That is not a title to be proud of - it is one of great shame.

Sadly our governments have failed to learn the painful and destructive lessons of the past, and have escalated the rate of child stealing in the last decade on the ludicrous premise that it is better to take a child on an unregistered caseworkers opinion - because they might suffer a risk of harm at some time in the future if left with family; whilst at the same time failing to acknowledge the far greater evidenced harm to children forcibly removed and placed in care that has damaging lifelong consequences both for the child and their family.

While the Federal Government keeps apologising to one stolen generation after another, and acknowledges time and time again the harm state governments have inflicted on vulnerable children and their families for decades caused by the failures of the state child protection systems, nothing has changed.  This is because there is too much power and no accountability in this corrupt industry. Child stealing by governments always has and always will be a total failure as governments are evidenced to be the worst parents of all.

 
What is Halal slaughter in Australia?
Written by RSPCA Australia   
Monday, 19 January 2015 00:00

Halal tastes better ingredient pain and suffering 86968"Halal describes what is lawful for Muslims to eat. Halal food laws are based on interpretation of the Quran, the Muslim scripture, and set out the range of beverages and foods (including meat) that are acceptable for Muslims to eat. The procedures for Halal slaughter can vary from place to place because of the differing interpretations of the Quran: this article describes Halal slaughter in Australia". 

(Click here to view the difference between Australian standards and Halal slaughter - make sure you have the noise turned on so you can hear the baby lambs crying and screaming as they have their throat slit and are strung up by one hoof for flaying - whilst they're alive. All other lambs are present when this is happening). ** Alecomm note.

"The main concern with halal slaughter is whether or not pre-slaughter stunning is used. In Australia, the national standard for meat production requires that all animals must be effectively stunned (unconscious) prior to slaughter. The vast majority of halal slaughter in Australia complies with this standard, that is, all animals are stunned prior to slaughter. The only difference is that a reversible stunning method is used, while conventional humane slaughter may use an irreversible stunning method. The time to regain consciousness following a reversible stun may vary depending on the intensity of the stun. At Australian abattoirs, the aim is to ensure that reversible stunning is done in a way that depth of unconsciousness is sufficient to allow for the animal to bleed out and die before there is a chance of regaining consciousness.

 
New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal - Appeal Panel
Wednesday, 12 November 2014 15:06

pigs in a troughSML 39356The Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal[i] is where people who have had guardianship orders placed upon them can apply to have them revoked or changed.  This is only supposed to  happen when there is either nobody to care for the person.  Unfortunately, locking people up in Aged Care and or Residential facilities is extremely lucrative for all those involved - from the NGO who gets paid to "care" for the client, the solicitors appointed by the government who are supposed to act on behalf of the government and both the Guardianship Tribunals and the Public Guardians also. 

In studying various cases, there seems to be an extraordinary amount of human rights violations, whereby the Guardianship Tribunal, the Trustee and the Administrative Tribunal appear to be in collusion with each other in order to keep a person and their property under their absolute control.

No right to choose your own legal representation.

As a general rule, NCAT refuses to allow persons to have legal representation stating “the general rule in the Guardianship Division is that a party has the carriage of his or her own case and is not entitled to be represented by any other person”. [ii]

However “a party may be represented by another person only if the Tribunal grants leave for the person to represent the party”. [iii]

This means that you do not have any entitlement to legal representation to appeal any Guardianship Tribunal decision, unless the Guardianship Tribunal says you can.  And even then, it will only be if the Tribunal allows that particular legal representative to represent you.

 
Deborah-Lee Furness a disgrace to Forgotten Australians, Forced Adoptions and Stolen Generations worldwide
Saturday, 19 April 2014 12:39

Debra Furness Not Your Child sml c4588Deborah-Lee Furnesss and her husband Hugh Jackman took advantage of a young desperate mother.  A mother who was promised an Open Adoption.  If this couple wanted to do something nice for all they money they are worth, they would have put that child's needs in front of their own wants, and they would have helped that mother.  It's not like she needed a hand out - she just needed a hand up.

Yet Furness and Jackman held out both hands and took her straight from her womb.  And the papers lied and said the young mother's children were all in care - but truth is when she was pregnant with the child that they stole - she had a 14 mth baby still with her.   Trying to demonise the childless mother is just another low tactic by the baby snatchers, and is extremely common.  And what mother does not suffer depression when their child is ripped from their arms, or in this case, their placenta?

Fancy making out that they helped that little boy!  If they truly wanted to help, they would have ensured that the boy could have stayed with his mother and it doesn't take a genius to know what children want and need.  Growing up rich may have it's benefits - but not knowing who you are does not.

 
Magistrate Daynor Trigg tells open court that the laws of parliament do not apply to him.
Written by Alecomm. Case Ref - Trigg : 25-11-14 File : 21432611 NT   
Tuesday, 09 December 2014 10:49

jackass of the day d82caAlice Springs Magistrate (Daynor) Trigg recently told applicants to an appeal in civil court that the laws handed down by parliament do not apply to him.  The legislation pertaining to the matter was brought to his attention during the proceedings by the applicant.

Then he gave an Order which did not contain any reasons for judgement or decision - not surprising though given his lack of purporting to enforce the laws which he took oath to uphold.  How could he anyway, given his blatant disregard for them ... Replies to requests for Reasons for Order were "There are no written reasons provided which is not unusual in the Magistrates Jurisdiction.  Reasons were stated by the Magistrate orally (this is standard practice)."  However a search on judgements by Trigg showed every case had Reasons for Judgement provided. View

Well if the laws do not apply to Trigg, and it is not his job to enforce them, the public should know - and people should either have the right to have their matter heard before a real judge not some idiot in a kangaroo court who has a complete and blatant disregard for the law because it does not appeal to his agenda.

The Stupidiary Magistrate told parties today that the laws don’t apply in his courtroom because “they are the laws that parliament makes”. (Nice one Trigg, can’t wait to see that in the transcript or does his office alter official records to their convenience also?).  The matter was on appeal of decision made by Darwin Lawyer acting as the “Commission of Tenancies”, whereby the Commissioner refused to apply the law in the matter in which the tenants broke the lease due to unemployment, and since the matter first arose (the agents, Golden Home RE) have seeked to claim over $9,000 in under various sections of the residential tenancies act.  (Which we might add is highly illegal).

So what are the issues in the case, and why aren't the real estate entitled to make any claims of compensation ?

Well, the first issue is that Section 121 claims states the landlord must file any invoices within the required seven day time limit, or they cannot make a claim. (And they did not file within the time period allocated). [ii] View attached claim.   The claims are illegal and furthermore, they are not invoice claims in any case - they are only quotes that were obtained under false pretense.  And the work was never followed through by the companies who provided the quotes.

Then the landlord then filed a Section 122 Claim for Compensation (attached) [iv] for another $4,000 for pretty much the same expenses that they were already claiming under Section 121 – which under law is not allowed. [v]

Attachments:
Download this file (ATTACHMENTS TO RTO1 - ANNEXURE D APPLICATION TO COMMISSIONERS SML.jpg)GH RTO8 page 1[ ]
Download this file (ATTACHMENTS TO RTO1 - ANNEXURE E - APPLICATION TO COMMISSIONERS SML.jpg)GH RTO8 page 2[ ]
Download this file (Quotes RTO8 2 sml.jpg)Quote 2 page 1 purported to be Invoice 2[No invoice was claimed in the seven day period.]
Download this file (Quotes RTO8 3SML.jpg)Quote 2 page 2 purported to be Invoice 2[No invoice was claimed in the seven day period.]
Download this file (RTO1ANNEXURE1-EDIT.jpg)Quote 1 purported to be Invoice 1[No invoice was claimed in the seven day period.]
 
Royal Commission protecting Hillsong Church by preventing victims from giving evidence
Friday, 10 October 2014 09:08

Hillsong Protectedsml 2a363Victims of Hillsong Church that have finally found the courage to come forward after many years have been told that their evidence will not be taken by the current Royal Commission.

When the Commission was first launched, other victims had said it was going to be nothing more than "a fishing expedition", to find out "who knew what" and "who was still alive", so they [Hillsong] could solve the problems.  Then with the announcement of Bob Atkinson on the Commission, and his links to protecting paedophiles sparking a petition to have him removed, former victims did not believe the Royal Commission could possibly attain anything decent let alone justice given his stance on protecting paedophiles.

Other victims that have come forward to give evidence to the Royal Commission have been told that because they have posted about Hillsong and the Royal Commission on various social media sites, that they are unable to now give evidence.

 
MP Gabrielle Upton, NSW FACS minister is silencing parents when kids go missing in foster care
Friday, 03 October 2014 12:41

Rumour has it, that the most recent three year old child being plastered all over the media as missing has actually gone missing from his foster care placement, and that Gabrielle Upton has attempted to use a media gag on people who want to tell the truth about this child.  Many of us were wondering why there have been no specifics about the case, for example, nothing has been mentioned about the childs family - and this is why. 

Now the media are being forced to lie (so to speak) because they already released the name and photo of the child referred to ... and are saying that the child went missing from his grandmothers (when it wasn't).

How cruel a woman could be, that she would use her powers, to prevent a family who have already experienced the horrors of child protection, from being able to discuss the fact that their toddler has mysteriously disappeared from the foster placement.

 
Are you looking to donate time to a worthy charity?

The Australian Legislative Ethics Commission is currently seeking lawyers / solicitors and barristers donate their time and effort to assist clients who are currently fighting in the Children's Courts of Australia.  Our organisation is a recognised charitable institution, and we seek no frills attached legal expertise on a regular basis to assist clients who have had their children taken by child protection personnel who have repeatedly failed to abide by the law, follow procedure and guidelines, and provide any opportunity to those who had children removed with any opportunity to have their children returned to their care.

 
Parents stunned by news of inquiry into baby’s death while in care
Monday, 29 December 2014 00:00

Canada baby inquiry not SIDS but smothered in foster care sheets fd9d2Paul Jean holds his daughter, Dani Isabella Jean, shortly before she died on May 4, 2013. She was found tangled in her foster mother's bed sheets. EDMONTON - Paul Jean believed for more than a year that his six-week-old daughter had died in foster care from Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

From a newspaper report in August he learned she’d actually become tangled in her foster parents’ bed sheets, and died by accident. He also believed for a long time that a Child and Youth Advocate’s report into Dani Jean’s death, released in August 2014, was the final word from the government. But on Saturday, also from a newspaper report, he discovered that the province had ordered a fatality inquiry into her death.

 
Have you been SLAPPED?

SLAPP SMLLR 7b164A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.*

The typical SLAPP plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff's goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism. In some cases, repeated frivolous litigation against a defendant may raise the cost of directors and officers liability insurance for that party, interfering with an organization's ability to operate.*

A SLAPP may also intimidate others from participating in the debate. A SLAPP is often preceded by a legal threat. The difficulty is that plaintiffs do not present themselves to the Court admitting that their intent is to censor, intimidate or silence their critics. Hence, the difficulty in drafting SLAPP legislation, and in applying it, is to craft an approach which affords an early termination to invalid abusive suits, without denying a legitimate day in court to valid good faith claims. *

Australian needs an anti-SLAPP statute.

 
Why is Blackmail so common by state child protection caseworkers?
Tuesday, 04 November 2014 11:42

blackmail sml 95368The answer is quite simple .. Because nobody keeps check of them.  And they know it. 

A recent call to the states Independent Commission Against Corruption, to ask how they would handle a matter whereby caseworkers are blackmailing both the immediate and extended family, has shown to be a pointless effort as the ICAC could not promise to give the family protection after they made the disclosure of Blackmail.

It (appears) that Public Officials are protected, but the people who's lives are being affected by these criminals are not, and those committing the crimes are completely protected - all the way to the top.

Parents are being told that if they "do not sign Care Plans that relinquish care of the children to the department, until the children reach 18 years of age", that they will never see their kids again.

Kinship carers are also told that if they do not oppose each and every application by the parents, that they will have the children removed from their care and they too will not see the kids again.

ICAC, when queried, stated they cannot guarantee that there will be no adverse consequences for the parents coming forward to disclose the blackmail (and coercion and threats), though it was suggested that to allow for the children to be put into foster care, when they were already in kinship care, after the investigation starts, would definitely prove the threats indeed do exists, yet they still refuse to act in a protective manner toward the children who's lives are being ultimately threatened (and ruined) by corrupt "child protection" caseworkers. 

Other reading : I'm being blackmailed by child protection caseworkers, can I report this.

 
Barnardos have a different vision for the children they kidnap
Wednesday, 12 March 2014 13:04

turnbll twins sml ad2c7"Barnardos' Vision All children and young people will have caring families, in which they can grow safely and fulfill their potential." Baaaaahaaaaaa.

Not for these kids ... Well they envision then growing up - but in an entirely different family they have chosen for these babies.

At 3pm yesterday, a Coffs Harbour magistrate issued an arrest warrant for the retrieval of two kidnapped babies believed to be in the care of Barnardos.

The babies were illegally taken from a private hospital outside of Brisbane, and nobody has seen them since.

The magistrate previously issued orders that the babies be returned by 3pm yesterday afternoon - or failing that he would issue an arrest warrant.

Barnardos failed to hand over the kidnapped children to their parents, and at 4pm the magistrate issued the warrant, which was delivered to Barnardos shortly thereafter.

 
Another young girl commits suicide after being removed by Katherine child protective services in the Northern Territory
Written by Anonymous Report   
Thursday, 17 July 2014 10:41

nohumanrightsLast month a young girl took her own life, she was in the "care" of Katherine Child and Families Services. The family want answers. I have some of them. She started self harming two years ago, at first it was a cry for attention. She wanted to be in Katherine with her mother, who was doing her best, her Mum had a stroke, and welfare got involved. Their answer to help was to place her in care, then instead of keeping her in Katherine to be near her mother, said no carer's in Katherine and sent her straight to Darwin. She was a beautiful girl with a heart of gold.

She loved her Mum and wanted to be near her, she lived for her visits. Her mother did NOTHING wrong, no attempt was made to help keep her with her Mum or close to her. She was moved from foster home to foster home. She self placed herself with me, and was happy. She wanted to be normal, to be like every other teen, the truth is, when in care, these teens cannot have sleepovers with friends, go to special events like birthday parties, in short, they are NOT treated as children, they are numbers. They then start to run. They seek out what they want, normalacy, to be in a family.

 
Rape of another child in care of WA Child Protection
Friday, 03 October 2014 19:07

WA DCP 6yo daughter raped in careSMALL 33926Another young girl has had her life wrecked yet again by the department purporting to protect children.  

To make matters worse, the department couldn't be bothered telling the mother - after all, the mother is not important and has not been able to see her child in over two years in anycase.  So the local police told the mother, and then the caseworker sent her an email.

Nice one DCP.  So you took the child from the mother, but never charged her with any crimes, and then let the child get raped.

To add insult to injury - they are now trying to claim that the child was sexually assaulted prior to entering the "care" system of the government.  Unfortunately this contradicts the medical evidence obtained on the child when she was examined upon intake, and also the local police statements that it "only recently" happened.

Many parents whose children are raped in care are also accused of having the rape occur before the child was removed, in yet another measure that child protection takes to rid itself of any blame for the damage they cause.

This is the second case in as many weeks, where children are being raped in care.  In another case, a young girl was placed with a man who was reported as a sex offender over ten years ago in Queensland by competant authorities - however the department has continued to use his services, whilst he has continued to rape young children - some of whom are disabled.  One has to wonder what is wrong with these people - have they no conscience..

* Writing in red denotes changes of names to protect the parents and child in this matter - and not the department.

 
Australian governments own statistics prove children are safer at home than in foster care
Saturday, 03 March 2012 12:38

death in care 5296dAt June 2010, there were 1.36 million children under 15 years of age in NSW 1

Nationally there were 35,895 children in out-of-home care on 30 June 2010 2

As at 30 March, 2011, Labor left NSW with 17,931 children and young people in out-of-home care 3

122 children (88%) of deaths of children were residing with their families at the time of death 4

11 children (8%) were under the Parental Responsibility of the Minister for Family and Community Services & six children were in other care arrangements, such as a disability residential service, or with extended family members 5

Therefore the rate of children dying whilst with family is 1 per 11,147 and the rate of children dying is out of home care is 1 child per 996 foster carers / residential facilities.

We're pretty sure this means that children are safer with their parents fullstop.

 
Ex-Victoria child protection worker now menacing Queensland parents
Monday, 06 October 2014 20:06

VIC - Sarah Bebbington nei Streeter - SML Cropped KV 23993This woman is Sarah Bebbington, she was formerly known as Sarah Streeter when she was working for DHS Victoria.  This lady has been allowed to submit into affidavits uncorroborated medical statements about a mother, which in turn were used to remove her six week old baby.

Sarah Bebbington accused a mother of having Cardiomyopathy, Tracheitis and was repeatedly allowed to use such information in front of various Victorian magistrates over the past four years as the initial and main reason for removing the baby from the mother.

The mother did have tracheitis and epilepsy, but the medication she was on resolved the issues.  Unfortunately no matter how many times this matter was brought to the attention of the courts, the lies and gross exaggerations of this woman went unpunished.  Instead the mother was punished.

 
More Articles...

Want to help?

Enter Amount:

Did You Know?


... that 90 percent of all funds given for "child protection" DO NOT go to help children ?

Australian Legislative Ethics Commission, Powered by Joomla! and designed by SiteGround Joomla Templates
.